2017
DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.196578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors of Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract: Background:Previous studies of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) were mostly based on selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases, and risk factors of CI-AKI after emergency PCI are unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors of CI-AKI in a Chinese population undergoing emergency PCI.Methods:A total of 1061 consecutive patients undergoing emergency PCI during January 2013 and June 2015 were enrolled and divided into CI-AKI and non-CI-AKI group. Univariable and multiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
21
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the reduction of the proportion of high-risk cases also decreased the CV. In the present study, not only the mean CV (76.8 mL), but also the proportion of cases with dose greater than 200ml (6.1%) were lower than those of previous studies (6,21,22,29). Meanwhile, the CV was only reduced by 10.8 ml in TA Group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the reduction of the proportion of high-risk cases also decreased the CV. In the present study, not only the mean CV (76.8 mL), but also the proportion of cases with dose greater than 200ml (6.1%) were lower than those of previous studies (6,21,22,29). Meanwhile, the CV was only reduced by 10.8 ml in TA Group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…After cardiac catheterization, the incidence of CIN may be as low as 6% in patients undergoing elective catheterization (20); and reaching 23.8% in samples involving urgent catheterization (21). Our study showed the incidence of CIN was 11.4% in patients undergoing emergency primary PCI due to STEMI, lower than previous studies (21,22). From the results of statistical analysis, we could nd several characteristics concerning the low occurrence of CIN in our samples, such as lower mean age; lower infused CV (in our study the mean CV was 76.8 ml, well below the cut off points of risk listed in the literature: for some > 200 mL and others > 300 mL) (23,24); lower baseline SCr and only 12 (3.2%) patients with SCr greater than 2 mg/dL, which prevented comparisons of statistical value among patients with SCr equal to or lower versus higher than 2 mg/dL (SCr limit is usually used as a risk criteria for CIN); exclusion of patients with previous AMI, PCI, CABG, stroke, serious peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or recent exposure of contrast; elimination of high risk cases and failed operation, such as severe left main disease, preoperative hemodynamic instability, and reoperation or death within 72 hours; and mean total ischemic time was less than 6 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Hemoglobin levels and GFR were found to be predictors of CIN in patients treated with emergency PCI. 28,29 Mendi et al determined that there was a relationship between serum uric acid levels and CIN in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary PCI. 30 The association of new risk factor profile, which includes white blood cell count, body surface area, history of stroke, baseline SCr, intra-aortic balloon pump, and diuretics usage, with CIN in patients treated with emergency PCI was also reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been identified that a small body surface area is linked with an increased risk of CI-AKI in emergency PCI patients in our previous studies. [ 27 28 ] Forth, the present findings might be as a result of the high sensitivity of the CI-AKI definition and the special nature of the study population. [ 11 27 ] A higher eGFR usually came from a relatively lower SCr correspondingly, which was more apt to be diagnosed as CI-AKI due to a slight but ≥25% fluctuation of SCr above baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%