2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for developing osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot wounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our findings overall complement those identified in a systematic review and meta-analysis of diabetic foot infections which suggests that factors increasing the likelihood of osteomyelitis are probing to bone, ulcer size >2 cm 2 , ulcer duration >2 weeks or erythrocyte sedimentation rate >70. [5][6][7][8] Some case series suggest that a negative probe to bone test has a strong negative predictive value (0.98), whereas a positive probe to bone test only has a positive predictive value of 0.57. 9 In our series, however, the inability to probe to bone did not reliably exclude osteomyelitis, consistent with many studies that suggest no single factor can reliably include/ exclude osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our findings overall complement those identified in a systematic review and meta-analysis of diabetic foot infections which suggests that factors increasing the likelihood of osteomyelitis are probing to bone, ulcer size >2 cm 2 , ulcer duration >2 weeks or erythrocyte sedimentation rate >70. [5][6][7][8] Some case series suggest that a negative probe to bone test has a strong negative predictive value (0.98), whereas a positive probe to bone test only has a positive predictive value of 0.57. 9 In our series, however, the inability to probe to bone did not reliably exclude osteomyelitis, consistent with many studies that suggest no single factor can reliably include/ exclude osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In our series, however, the inability to probe to bone did not reliably exclude osteomyelitis, consistent with many studies that suggest no single factor can reliably include/ exclude osteomyelitis. [5][6][7] A limitation of this small case series review is that bone biopsy was not performed for microbiological identification. Other studies of diabetic foot infection have found that bone biopsy guided antibiotic treatment may be more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be an obvious large wound or ulcer associated with erythema and pyrexia. The presence of any exposed bone and ulcer larger than 2 cm 2 increasesthe likelihood of osteomyelitis [17]. Osteomyelitis should be suspected in a patient with an adequate blood supply to the affected foot that has a deep ulcer which would not heal after 6 weeks of appropriate wound care and off-loading [17].…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of any exposed bone and ulcer larger than 2 cm 2 increasesthe likelihood of osteomyelitis [17]. Osteomyelitis should be suspected in a patient with an adequate blood supply to the affected foot that has a deep ulcer which would not heal after 6 weeks of appropriate wound care and off-loading [17]. It is important to distinguish between the ischaemic and the neuropathic foot although these factors may co-exist [2,6].…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A DFU carries a 50% risk for infection and at least 20% of those receive some form of amputation. [2][3][4] Foot ulcers manifest themselves as a region of tissue loss typically below the malleoli. Treatment of a DFU is essential to reduce the risk of complications and amputations.…”
Section: Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%