2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and regulation: A difference-in-differences analysis for Italian local banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also remarkable to highlight that the coefficient of time is always negative, indicating that during the years of the Lehman crisis the MCBs register significant losses in efficiency. While the nexus between crisis and small banks efficiency deserves to be investigated better, as done by Barra et al (), it is interesting to point out that our evidence is in line with the results provided by Tabak et al (), which focus on US savings banks over the period 2001–2009.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Mcb Performance: the Empty Mlm And The Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also remarkable to highlight that the coefficient of time is always negative, indicating that during the years of the Lehman crisis the MCBs register significant losses in efficiency. While the nexus between crisis and small banks efficiency deserves to be investigated better, as done by Barra et al (), it is interesting to point out that our evidence is in line with the results provided by Tabak et al (), which focus on US savings banks over the period 2001–2009.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Mcb Performance: the Empty Mlm And The Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The period under scrutiny involved the years of crisis 2006–2011. This was a period of severe instability, whose effect on MCBs have not been studied in depth (the exception is Barra et al ). This paper contributes to the debate first by updating the analysis of the level and dynamics of MCB performance and secondly by modeling time as a determinant of MCB efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a review of the topic on the years before the 2007 crisis, see Beck et al (2015), Ghosh (2015), Ozili (2015) and Tanaskovi c and Jandri c (2015). Studies that have considered the causes of rising NPLs after the 2007 financial crisis for (all or some) EU countries include: Skarica (2014), Beck et al (2015), Barra et al (2016), Tanaskovi c and Jandri c (2015) and Anastasiou et al (2016Anastasiou et al ( , 2019a [1]. Skarica (2014) is the first empirical study on the countries of the CEE region using aggregate, country-level data on problem loans.…”
Section: A Short Review Of the Empirical Studies On Npls In European Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have strongly approved of the inclusion of some environmental and bankspecific variables in a one-stage stochastic frontier (Lozano-Vivas et al, 2002, Hasan et al, 2009, particularly when considering the Italian context (Destefanis et al, 2014;Barra et al, 2016). Therefore, we include in the z-vector associated with the technical inefficiency of production units for the following environmental and bank-specific factors: (i) bank size as measured by the natural logarithm of total assets (TA); (ii) bank capitalization as measured by the ratio of equity to total assets (ETA); (iii) typology of banks such as MBs and PBs in which popular banks are used as the benchmark group; (iv) macro areas such as North-West (N-W), North-East (N-E), and South&Islands (SI), while Central (CE) is used as a benchmark to control for any unobservable territorial effects; and (v) the typology of major, large, medium, small, and minor.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%