2002
DOI: 10.1136/adc.86.3.194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk adjusted mortality of critical illness in a defined geographical region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our study which was retrospective we could not objectively determine the severity of our patients' illness using tools like the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and the Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) since they were not applied from the onset. Though several studies have suggested better outcome in critically ill children managed in the PICU as compared with those managed in the general ICU, [3][4][5][6]18] we are yet to develop PICUs in our country and it will be interesting to find out the experiences of other general ICUs in our region with regards to the management of paediatric patients. Authors have reported mortality rates between 2-16% from PICUs in other parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in our study which was retrospective we could not objectively determine the severity of our patients' illness using tools like the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and the Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) since they were not applied from the onset. Though several studies have suggested better outcome in critically ill children managed in the PICU as compared with those managed in the general ICU, [3][4][5][6]18] we are yet to develop PICUs in our country and it will be interesting to find out the experiences of other general ICUs in our region with regards to the management of paediatric patients. Authors have reported mortality rates between 2-16% from PICUs in other parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a report by the British Paediatric Association in 1993 did not show any difference in the outcome between children managed in a dedicated paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and those managed in a general ICU, [2] subsequent studies by other authors have indicated an improved outcome in critically ill children managed in the PICU. [3][4][5][6] Though general and neonatal ICUs are now commonly found in our country, it is not so with PICUs and so most critically ill children are managed in the general ICUs along with adults. The ICU in our hospital is a general (multidisciplinary) ICU established 27 years ago to cater for critically ill patients of all age groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study was not designed to compare outcome, the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of children managed in the PICU was lower than in adult ICUs, and previous studies of critically ill children have shown that those in the highest risk stratum have a significantly greater risk of dying if treated outside a designated PICU. 5 Interestingly, PIM discriminated better between death and survival in district general hospitals than in the regional PICU. One might speculate that the reason for this closer modelling is because the physiological data necessary for PIM are collected at an earlier time point in the child's hospital course than when the PICU team collects them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 1988, Pollack et al 6 developed a risk adjustment method, the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score based on acute physiological derangement, to facilitate comparisons of mortality between different populations of critically ill children. Limited multicenter validation 7 has been published and no equivalent studies from India are available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%