2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-020-09496-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RippleNet: a Recurrent Neural Network for Sharp Wave Ripple (SPW-R) Detection

Abstract: Hippocampal sharp wave ripples (SPW-R) have been identified as key bio-markers of important brain functions such as memory consolidation and decision making. Understanding their underlying mechanisms in healthy and pathological brain function and behaviour rely on accurate SPW-R detection. In this multidisciplinary study, we propose a novel, self-improving artificial intelligence (AI) detection method in the form of deep Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) with Long Short-Term memory (LSTM) layers that can learn f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional neural networks consist of an input layer, an implicit layer, and an output layer, and although there are connections between the layers, the nodes within the layers are not connected [ 14 ]. As a result, many real-world problems cannot be handled using conventional neural networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Conventional neural networks consist of an input layer, an implicit layer, and an output layer, and although there are connections between the layers, the nodes within the layers are not connected [ 14 ]. As a result, many real-world problems cannot be handled using conventional neural networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Those SWR waveforms that were not agreed upon across the subjects discarded. A recently developed recurrent neural-network based automated tool (Hagen et al, 2021) was tested on a subset of recordings used in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (n = 12 mice, 35 sessions, 4509 SWR). The ratio of events deemed SWR by both the recurrent network and visual inspection to those events only deemed SWR by the recurrent network was 0.92, indicating that results from visual inspection closely matched a more objective, automated method for SWR detection.…”
Section: Quantification and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, the filter exhibited larger variability across sessions. Our CNN performed similar to a filter-based optimized algorithm (F1=0.66 ± 0.11) (Dutta et al, 2019), but significantly better than RippleNET, a recurrent network designed to detect SWR mostly during periods of immobility (F1=0.31 ± 0.21; p<0.00001 one-way ANOVA for comparisons with both CNN12 and CNN32) (Hagen et al, 2021). This supports similar operation of CNN as compared with the gold standard in conditions when optimized detection was possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, with the advent of ultra-dense recordings, the need for automatic identification is pressing. In spite of recent advances (Dutta et al, 2019; Hagen et al, 2021), current solutions still fall short in capturing the complexity of SWR events across hippocampal layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%