2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rippled scour depressions add ecologically significant heterogeneity to soft-bottom habitats on the continental shelf

Abstract: Comprehensive mapping of California's state waters has revealed rippled scour depressions (RSDs) to be abundant and widespread on the inner continental shelf. Ranging from 100s to 1000s of m 2 in areal extent, RSDs are 30 to 50 cm deep depressions of coarser sediments and longer period bedforms than found on the surrounding seabed. Although RSDs have been physically described on many continental margins, previous studies have not addressed the ecological influence and associated biological communities of RSDs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, sands with "littoral" grain sizes (i.e., >180 microns) are found in a diversity of settings throughout the inner and outer Monterey Bay. For example, sandy settings include offshore bedrock reef aprons, rippled-scour depressions, sand waves, and the majority of the outer shelf of the bay (Eittreim et al, 2002;Storlazzi and Reid, 2010;Hallenbeck et al, 2012;Golden, 2013;Rosenberger et al, 2019). All of these sand deposits are potential sources to the four coring sites, in contrast with the first Carlin et al (2019) assumption.…”
Section: Variability In Shelf Sedimentation In Response To Fluvial Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, sands with "littoral" grain sizes (i.e., >180 microns) are found in a diversity of settings throughout the inner and outer Monterey Bay. For example, sandy settings include offshore bedrock reef aprons, rippled-scour depressions, sand waves, and the majority of the outer shelf of the bay (Eittreim et al, 2002;Storlazzi and Reid, 2010;Hallenbeck et al, 2012;Golden, 2013;Rosenberger et al, 2019). All of these sand deposits are potential sources to the four coring sites, in contrast with the first Carlin et al (2019) assumption.…”
Section: Variability In Shelf Sedimentation In Response To Fluvial Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This textural heterogeneity reflects a complex patchwork of contrasting sedimentary environments that, in turn, creates contrasting epifaunal-and infaunal-dominated habitats (Hallenbeck et al 2012). The coarse lag deposits of Pleistocene till and glacial outwash that floor some of the scour depressions reflect higher-energy sedimentary environments characterized by processes associated with erosion and non-deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prey transitioning into or out of the sand, such as sand lance Ammodytes hexapterus (Love 2011), or vertically migrating pelagic invertebrates (Murie 1995) may also be potential prey. Juvenile fish are another known food item for quillback rockfish (Murie 1995), and have been shown to reside within rippled scour depression habitat, defined in part as depressions in the seabed comprised of sediments coarser than the surrounding area (Hallenbeck et al 2012). Multibeam and sidescan sonar data from the foray areas show gravel beds recessed up to 0.5 m below the surrounding sand, which may similarly provide juvenile fish habitat and prey for quillback rockfish in an otherwise featureless area (Goldfinger et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%