2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigidity dependence of cosmic ray proton latitudinal gradients measured by the Ulysses spacecraft: Implications for the diffusion tensor

Abstract: Abstract. The latitudinal gradient of cosmic ray protons observed by Ulysses during September 1994 to July 1995 is small, and it increases as function of rigidity up to -0 2 GV and then decreases. Although previous drift models could reproduce the observed small positive gradient for an A > 0 solar polarity cycle, they produced a maximum at a rigidity well below i GV, in contrast to the observations. After exploring various options, it turns out that changing the rigidity dependence of the perpendicular diffus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
323
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
24
323
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, once the LIS is fixed, the value of φ unambiguously determines the GCR energy spectrum. Here we use the modulation potential based on the LIS by Burger, Potgieter & Heber (2000), and all the values of the modulation potential are referred to this LIS. We have checked that the exact choice of reference LIS does not affect our result.…”
Section: The Heliospheric Modulation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, once the LIS is fixed, the value of φ unambiguously determines the GCR energy spectrum. Here we use the modulation potential based on the LIS by Burger, Potgieter & Heber (2000), and all the values of the modulation potential are referred to this LIS. We have checked that the exact choice of reference LIS does not affect our result.…”
Section: The Heliospheric Modulation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thus consisting of one component directed along the mean HMF, κ || is taken from Burger et al (2008), and two component perpendicular to it, κ ⊥r/θ is taken from Burger et al (2000). As input for κ || various turbulence quantities are needed, most notable the HMF variance δB 2 .…”
Section: The Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional form of u D is taken from Burger et al (2000), but assumed to be only 55% effective, based on A&A 522, A35 (2010) the modelling done by Potgieter (1989), Langner et al (2004) and Minnie et al (2007). Neutral sheet drift is due to the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) and as the modulation model is limited to solar minimum conditions, a HCS tilt angle of α = 10 • is assumed.…”
Section: The Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because S * is of arbitrary magnitude, the modelled ACR intensities must be scaled to observed levels (see also Jokipii 1996), because no absolute measurement of the PUI source function is available. The spatial diffusion tensor K s is according to Burger et al (2000), changing across the TS according to the results of Zank et al (1996). The average guiding center drift velocity, including curvature, gradient and neutral sheet drifts, u D is related to the asymmetrical drift tensor K A by u D = ∇ × K A e B with e B = B/B, where B is the Parker spiral magnetic field (Parker 1958).…”
Section: The Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of this field is modified in the polar regions of the heliosphere following the approach of Jokipii & Kóta (1989). The drift tensor K A used here is described by Burger et al (2000). However, drifts are assumed to be only 55% effective according to the work of Potgieter (1989), Langner et al (2004) and Minnie et al (2007).…”
Section: The Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%