2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2009.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigi—An environment for software reverse engineering, exploration, visualization, and redocumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An excellent overview of software visualization is given by Diehl [23]. Wellknown software visualization systems include Rigi [24], VCG [25], aiSee [26], Mondrian [27], and sv3D [28] (for structure and metrics); and CodeCity [29,30] and SeeSoft [31] (for software evolution).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An excellent overview of software visualization is given by Diehl [23]. Wellknown software visualization systems include Rigi [24], VCG [25], aiSee [26], Mondrian [27], and sv3D [28] (for structure and metrics); and CodeCity [29,30] and SeeSoft [31] (for software evolution).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panas et al [8] proposes a 3D visualization metaphor to model software production cost as real cities. A reverse engineering environment called Rigi is presented in [9] to analyze, interactively explore, summarize, and document large projects. Marcus et al [10] presented the sv3D framework for software visualization.…”
Section: A Visualizing Static Code Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eCST is more fine-grained than a FAMIX model. Heavyweight models similar to FAMIX, such as KDM [4] or ASTM [3] as well as general-purpose models such as RSF [45] or GXL [86] model not only the kinds of nodes, but also their relationships and structure explicitly. The same is true for M 3 [41], which is specifically designed for use with Rascal Metaprogramming Language [40] and which also includes noncode concepts such as physical and logical source locations.…”
Section: Multi-language Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%