2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Ventricular Myocardial Performance Index Predicts Perioperative Mortality or Circulatory Failure in High-Risk Valvular Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
85
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…found that RV MPI assessed by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was associated with a higher incidence of circulatory failure after aortic and mitral valve surgery 20. Maslow et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that RV MPI assessed by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was associated with a higher incidence of circulatory failure after aortic and mitral valve surgery 20. Maslow et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RV systolic dysfunction, however, is associated with decreased preoperative cardiac output and a greater requirement of inotropic support after valvular surgery. 55,56 Traditional teaching has been that the RV may sustain severe tricuspid regurgitation for a long time without adverse consequences. Recently, however, Messika-Zeitoun and colleagues 8 have demonstrated that flail tricuspid valve is associated with decreased survival and a high incidence of HF, atrial fibrillation, and need for valve replacement.…”
Section: Valvular Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haddad et al (Haddad et al, 2007) further assessed the value of RV function relative to other validated risk factors in open valvular heart surgery on 50 patients undergoing valvular surgery. Patients with RV myocardial performance index (RVMPI) < 50% (n=20) presented a significantly higher occurrence of circulatory failure (16/20 (80%) vs 6/30 (20%), p<0.0001) as well as a higher postoperative heart failure mortality (14/20 (74%) vs 3/30 (10%), p<0.0001).…”
Section: Experience At the Montreal Heart Institutementioning
confidence: 99%