2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right posterior cortical functions in a tumour patient series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This goes against the hypothesis that the removed regions were not implicated in visuospatial processing, and is consistent with the idea that no restricted cortical lesion is sufficient to produce attentional deficits (Bartolomeo, 2011;Shallice et al, 2010. The present findings would rather suggest that these patients had already recruited remotely connected regions to compensate for functional loss.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3). This goes against the hypothesis that the removed regions were not implicated in visuospatial processing, and is consistent with the idea that no restricted cortical lesion is sufficient to produce attentional deficits (Bartolomeo, 2011;Shallice et al, 2010. The present findings would rather suggest that these patients had already recruited remotely connected regions to compensate for functional loss.…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the remaining patients, tumour resection impaired lateralized target detection (accuracy and RTs) and visual exploration (see Shallice et al, 2010 for similar results, p1185). Deficits in detection and visual exploration occurred after resections in similar sites (see panel B in Fig.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations