2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological evaluations of interground and blended cement–limestone suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) was as follows: 10" from 0 to 45 rad/s [A1 point]; 30" at 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 10" from 45 to 27 rad/s; 10" at 9 rad/s; 10" from 9 to 0 rad/s [C 1 point]; 10" rest [C 2 point]; 10" from 0 to 9 rad/s; 10" from 9 to 27 rad/s; 10" at 27 rad/s; 10" from 27 to 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 30" at 45 rad/s [B 2 point] and 10" from 45 to 0 rad/s [C 3 point]. Trials were conducted during latent hydration at 25 °C because the vis cosity of these materials is strongly dependent on the shear rate applied and on the degree of hydration of the cement paste, so this experimental scheme minimizes the different cement hydration rate influence [7][8][9][10][11]19]. Fig.…”
Section: (°)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) was as follows: 10" from 0 to 45 rad/s [A1 point]; 30" at 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 10" from 45 to 27 rad/s; 10" at 9 rad/s; 10" from 9 to 0 rad/s [C 1 point]; 10" rest [C 2 point]; 10" from 0 to 9 rad/s; 10" from 9 to 27 rad/s; 10" at 27 rad/s; 10" from 27 to 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 30" at 45 rad/s [B 2 point] and 10" from 45 to 0 rad/s [C 3 point]. Trials were conducted during latent hydration at 25 °C because the vis cosity of these materials is strongly dependent on the shear rate applied and on the degree of hydration of the cement paste, so this experimental scheme minimizes the different cement hydration rate influence [7][8][9][10][11]19]. Fig.…”
Section: (°)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings were also applied to determine the most appropriate type of cycle to be used for each fresh paste. Suitability was defined in terms of the area of the hysteresis loop characteristic of the thixotropic behaviour of fresh pastes [7][8][9][10] (the larger the better) and the response observed in the Portland cements with different potential mineralogical compositions [11]. The best results were analysed and the rheological behaviour of the fresh Portland cement pastes studied after the inclusion of apparently inert (i.e., non-pozzolanic) fillers with variable origin, chemical composition, mineralogy, geology and particle size, shape and intimate texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper plate was serrated to a depth of 1 mm and the lower plate to a depth of 0.15 mm to prevent slip at the shearing surface. The rheological sequence consisted of: (a) a stepped ramp up pre‐shear phase lasting approximately 80 seconds to homogenize the paste, (b) a subsequent stepped ramp‐up, and (c) a stepped ramp‐down, as shown in Figure A . Data acquisition was completed during only the final ramp‐up and ramp‐down phases, and only data from the down‐ramp portion was used to extract the rheological parameters.…”
Section: Binder Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) was as follows: 10 00 from 0 to 45 rad/s [A1 point]; 30 00 at 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 10 00 from 45 to 27 rad/s; 10 00 at 9 rad/s; 10 00 from 9 to 0 rad/s [C1 point]; 10 00 rest [C 2 point]; 10 00 from 0 to 9 rad/s; 10 00 from 9 to 27 rad/s; 10 00 at 27 rad/s; 10 00 from 27 to 45 rad/s [A 2 point]; 30 00 at 45 rad/s [B 2 point] and 10 00 from 45 to 0 rad/s [C 3 point]. Trials were conducted during latent hydration at 25 °C because the viscosity of these materials is strongly dependent on the shear rate applied and on the degree of hydration of the cement paste, so this experimental scheme minimizes the different cement hydration rate influence [11][12][13]. Yield stress (x 0 ) parameter values were also adjusted with the model that provides a better regression, in this case was Casson equation (Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield stress (x 0 ) parameter values were also adjusted with the model that provides a better regression, in this case was Casson equation (Eq. (1)) [11][12][13]. Yield stress (x 0 ) parameter values were also adjusted with the model they provides a better regression, in this case was Casson equation (Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%