2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewarming Patterns in Hand Fracture Patients With and Without Cold Intolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of allodynia has been described in animal pain models (45)(46)(47) and also in patients after hand fracture (48,49). However, the underlying mechanism(s) of cold allodynia in our model remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This type of allodynia has been described in animal pain models (45)(46)(47) and also in patients after hand fracture (48,49). However, the underlying mechanism(s) of cold allodynia in our model remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…ABCI of the hand and fingers is a significant problem after injuries to the upper limb, [4][5][6]12,13 most frequently described after digital injuries and digital replantation. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In contrast to several reports on ABCI after hand injuries, [4][5][6][7][27][28][29] which correlated ABCI development to the patency of repaired digital arteries, 12,20 ABCI after repair of major arm arteries (ie, subclavian, axillary, brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries) was not analyzed in large series up to now. In 1979, Gelberman et al 14 studied hemodynamic alterations and symptoms of cold intolerance after single forearm arterial injuries with (n ϭ 13) and without (n ϭ 7) concomitant neurological lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For testing of ABCI, we used a free-accessible standardized questionnaire, the CISS questionnaire, which was first published by Irwin et al 3 and modified by Ruijs et al 4 in 2006. The CISS form was frequently used recently to assess cold-related problems, 5,6,28,29,35 and ABCI was defined as a CISS score over 30. 4 The CISS form represents a clear and simple questionnaire which is based on six questions asking for symptoms, frequency and relief of symptoms, individual adaption, and problems during daily activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a population-based case-control study, the condition was associated to frostbite, nerve injury, rheumatic disease, migraines, and vascular disease, while a high body mass index (≥25 kg/m 2 ) appeared protective [7]. The pathophysiology behind CS is obscure, but hypotheses regarding vascular and neurosensory mechanisms have been presented [8][9][10]. The diagnosis of CS is based on the symptoms reported by the individual, and questionnaires such as the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) score [11].…”
Section: Cold Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%