2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REVIEW: The UChA and UChB rat lines: metabolic and genetic differences influencing ethanol intake

Abstract: Ethanol non-drinker (UChA) and drinker (UChB) rat lines derived from an original Wistar colony have been selectively bred at the University of Chile for over 70 generations. Two main differences between these lines are clear. (1) Drinker rats display a markedly faster acute tolerance than non-drinker rats. In F2 UChA x UChB rats (in which all genes are 'shuffled'), a high acute tolerance of the offspring predicts higher drinking than a low acute tolerance. It is further shown that high-drinker animals 'learn' … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This line, derived from the Wistar strain, has been bred at the University of Chile for more than 70 generations (22). The animals were housed in individual cages under a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and had free access to water and food.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line, derived from the Wistar strain, has been bred at the University of Chile for more than 70 generations (22). The animals were housed in individual cages under a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and had free access to water and food.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six sets of ethanol-preferring and -nonpreferring rat lines/strains have been developed by selective breeding: (i) the University of Chile Bibulous/Abstainer (UChB/UChA) lines (Mardones et al, 1953; see Mardones and Segovia-Riquelme, 1983; see Quintanilla et al, 2006); (ii) the Alko alcohol/nonalcohol (AA/ANA) lines (Eriksson, 1971); (iii) the alcoholpreferring/-nonpreferring (P/NP) lines ; (iv) the high-/low-alcohol drinking (HAD/LAD) lines (Gongwer et al, 1989); (v) the Sardinian alcohol-preferring/-nonpreferring (sP/sNP) lines (Fadda et al, 1989), and (vi) the high (HARF) and low (LARF) alcohol consuming ARF lines (Lê et al, 2001). In the majority of these lines, rats bred to prefer ethanol have innate deficiencies of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system Gongwer et al, 1989;Stefanini el al., 1992;Zhou et al, 1995;Strother et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, rodents appear to have some internal controls limiting intake which are not shared by susceptible humans. Neurobiological and genetic findings from these selected lines are discussed in a series of recent reviews (Murphy et al 2002;Bell et al 2006;Colombo et al 2006;Quintanilla et al 2006;Sommer et al 2006). UChB (versus UChA), P (versus NP), AA (versus ANA), HAD (versus LAD), sP (versus sNP) and msP (versus msNP) rats (and HAP versus LAP mice) were all bred for the same trait using a nearly identical protocol; one could reasonably expect that strong genetic correlates of high alcohol preference should have emerged from these multiple replications.…”
Section: Selective Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%