Review of OECD study into “Projected costs of generating electricity—2010 Edition”

Khatib, Hisham

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.023

Cited by 17 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The maximal price increases from 528 $/MWH when US$ per MWH Days Capacity S is 10 times more expensive than capacity G Capacity S is 6 times more expensive than capapcity G Capacity S is 2 times more expensive than capacity G 10 The nature of the results of this study does not change when price elasticity is À 0.1 or À 0.25. 11 See Khatib (2010) and Lior (2010) and references therein for the costs of electricity generation by various technologies. 12 The first case, where the PV capacity cost is 10 times that of the CCGT capacity cost, reflects the current ratio in the Israeli market (Lior, 2010 andTrainer, 2010).…”

Section: Percent In 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Milstein

Tishler

2011

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

Section: Percent In 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Milstein

Tishler

2011

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

“…The most commonly used values are: 5, 8, 10 or 12%, depending on the degree of investment risk. A higher rate is assumed for investments with higher risk [11]. For LCOE calculation we proposed the approach which differentiate discount rates depending on the phase of the investment.…”

Section: Discount Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects for the use of SMR and IGCC technologies for power generation in Poland

Wyrwa

Suwała

2017

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

This study is a preliminary assessment of prospects for new power generation technologies that are of particular interest in Poland. We analysed the economic competitiveness of small size integrated gasification combined cycle units (IGCC) and small modular reactors (SMR). For comparison we used one of the most widely applied and universal metric i.e. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). The LCOE results were complemented with the results of energy-economic model TIMES-PL in order to analyse the economic viability of these technologies under operation regime of the entire power system. The results show that with techno-economic assumptions presented in the paper SMRs are more competitive option as compared to small IGCC units.

show abstract

“…Fundamentally, the longer time considered the more important role the discount rate plays. The cost of D&D is therefore transformed into a neglected value with somewhat 5% discount rate, however, which might not be the case actually [19]. The contribution of D&D cost to the LGC will be reconsidered by employing a specified discounting pattern with consideration of the social responsibility.…”

Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Analysis of a Pyroprocessing Coupled SFR Fuel Recycling

Gao

2012

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

View full text Add to dashboard Buy / Rent full text

Numerous studies have attempted to solve the problems constraining the sustainable utilization of nuclear power, for example, the already accumulated HLWs, the worsening environment due to greenhouse emissions, the questionable reliability of natural uranium resources, and the argument over nuclear safety, which are certainly top issues to be addressed. A well-organized nuclear fuel cycle system is the basis for nuclear power sustainability. Therefore, which type of reactor to be employed and whether or not to adopt a reprocessing technique for spent fuel are two key issues to be addressed. A Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR), a Generation IV reactor, has gained considerable attention worldwide. SFR recycling coupled to pyroprocessing, a so-called Pyro-SFR Recycling, shows promising advantages, and therefore, this paper focuses on exploring a strategy of how to realize it, which can offer informative procedures for a better use of nuclear power. A dynamic model has been developed to quantitatively analyze a countryspecific case employing two scenarios, a once-through and Pyro-SFR, for a comprehensive comparison, especially focusing on the uranium utilization, the HLW reduction, and the electricity generation cost.

show abstract

Review of OECD study into “Projected costs of generating electricity—2010 Edition”

Cited by 17 publications

References 2 publications

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Prospects for the use of SMR and IGCC technologies for power generation in Poland

Dynamic Analysis of a Pyroprocessing Coupled SFR Fuel Recycling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About