Review of OECD study into “Projected costs of generating electricity—2010 Edition”

Khatib, Hisham

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.023

Cited by 18 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The maximal price increases from 528 $/MWH when US$ per MWH Days Capacity S is 10 times more expensive than capacity G Capacity S is 6 times more expensive than capapcity G Capacity S is 2 times more expensive than capacity G 10 The nature of the results of this study does not change when price elasticity is À 0.1 or À 0.25. 11 See Khatib (2010) and Lior (2010) and references therein for the costs of electricity generation by various technologies. 12 The first case, where the PV capacity cost is 10 times that of the CCGT capacity cost, reflects the current ratio in the Israeli market (Lior, 2010 andTrainer, 2010).…”

Section: Percent In 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Milstein

Tishler

2011

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Percent In 2009mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Milstein

Tishler

2011

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…56 The most common economic indicators used within TE analysis are NPV, IRR and LCOE, the latter of which is the most well-known and has several methodologies. 9,[57][58][59] These are calculated considering the predicted energy production of a particular technology at a selected site and the associated costs to install, operate, maintain and decommission devices during a project lifetime. RETScreen and HOMER are regarded as the two most popular TE software tools in renewable energy.…”

Section: Techno Economic Approaches and Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of geographic information system (GIS) and techno economic (TE) software tools for renewable energy and methodology to develop a coupled GIS-TE software tool for marine renewable energy (MRE)

O’Connell

Murphy

McAuliffe

et al. 2023

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accurate and up-to-date Geographic Information System (GIS) and Techno Economic (TE) tools are pertinent to helping to develop the renewable energy sector. This paper reviews the state of the art in existing GIS and TE tools for renewable energy and proposes a methodology to develop a coupled GIS-TE software tool that is geared specifically to Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) applications and bespoke to Irish and Western UK waters. Methods for approaching GIS and TE analysis within existing tools for renewable energy are presented and compared. Many existing tools of this nature have some interesting functionalities, but most are unsuitable for MRE; are limited by a lack of information on both the technology and the site; and focus solely either on GIS or TE aspects of analysis. Additionally, almost all of those with a TE focus are not open access. The proposed tool aims to incorporate increased resolution and site relevance of resource data; the most up-to-date geospatial data for site selection; and will provide site specific TE indicators and recommendations for contemporary MRE devices. The result will be the development an open-access GIS-TE software tool for MRE.

show abstract

“…The most commonly used values are: 5, 8, 10 or 12%, depending on the degree of investment risk. A higher rate is assumed for investments with higher risk [11]. For LCOE calculation we proposed the approach which differentiate discount rates depending on the phase of the investment.…”

Section: Discount Ratesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects for the use of SMR and IGCC technologies for power generation in Poland

Wyrwa

Suwała

2017

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is a preliminary assessment of prospects for new power generation technologies that are of particular interest in Poland. We analysed the economic competitiveness of small size integrated gasification combined cycle units (IGCC) and small modular reactors (SMR). For comparison we used one of the most widely applied and universal metric i.e. Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). The LCOE results were complemented with the results of energy-economic model TIMES-PL in order to analyse the economic viability of these technologies under operation regime of the entire power system. The results show that with techno-economic assumptions presented in the paper SMRs are more competitive option as compared to small IGCC units.

show abstract

Review of OECD study into “Projected costs of generating electricity—2010 Edition”

Cited by 18 publications

References 2 publications

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

Intermittently renewable energy, optimal capacity mix and prices in a deregulated electricity market

A review of geographic information system (GIS) and techno economic (TE) software tools for renewable energy and methodology to develop a coupled GIS-TE software tool for marine renewable energy (MRE)

Prospects for the use of SMR and IGCC technologies for power generation in Poland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About