2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective evaluation of medication appropriateness and clinical pharmacist drug therapy recommendations for home-based primary care veterans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It also supports previous research exploring the perspectives of a broad range of Australian pharmacists (including accredited pharmacists), which reported strongest support for an expanded prescribing role in hypertension management among a select range of chronic conditions . Furthermore, the prescribing interventions described by these pharmacists were assessed as being largely clinically appropriate by doctors themselves, in line with findings from other studies exploring the appropriateness and/or uptake of pharmacist recommendations in other contexts, for example in older patients, management of lipid disorders and in high‐risk medication, such as thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients . In the latter study, there was no difference in the appropriateness of treatment prescribed by pharmacists compared with resident medical officers, but prescribing by pharmacists was shown to contain fewer clinically significant omissions and fewer prescribing errors .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It also supports previous research exploring the perspectives of a broad range of Australian pharmacists (including accredited pharmacists), which reported strongest support for an expanded prescribing role in hypertension management among a select range of chronic conditions . Furthermore, the prescribing interventions described by these pharmacists were assessed as being largely clinically appropriate by doctors themselves, in line with findings from other studies exploring the appropriateness and/or uptake of pharmacist recommendations in other contexts, for example in older patients, management of lipid disorders and in high‐risk medication, such as thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients . In the latter study, there was no difference in the appropriateness of treatment prescribed by pharmacists compared with resident medical officers, but prescribing by pharmacists was shown to contain fewer clinically significant omissions and fewer prescribing errors .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…15 One report that used the MAI retrospectively, similar to our study, showed that medication review significantly reduced patient MAI scores from baseline. 34 However, MAI scores between the studies may differ depending upon the setting, number of medications, types of patients and GPs, quality of prescribing, and clinical judgment of the raters; hence, the effects of the interventions must be interpreted within their own context. 35 In our study, improvement in the quality of prescribing was also observed in patients for whom outcome data were available (almost 38%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacist's recommendations to primary care providers and nurses involved drug initiation/discontinuation; laboratory monitoring; dosage adjustment; as well as monitoring for medication adherence; efficacy and adverse events [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%