2001
Retrograde Theory in Sialolithiasis Formation
Abstract: S ialolithiasis is a relatively frequent occurrence; however, cases of sialolithiasis originating around a "foreign body" nidus are rare. We describe a patient with submandibular sialolithiasis organized around a vegetal nidus and discuss the etiology of the case.
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
139
50
35
0
Citation Types
4
153
0
10
Year Published
2000
2026
Publication Types
Select...
189
8
6
5
Relationship
3
205
Authors
Journals
Cited by 208 publications
(167 citation statements)
References 16 publications
4
153
0
10
“…In another study, 15 salivary stones from 12 patients were examined for the presence of bacteria using optical and scanning electron microscopy, and qPCR revealed the presence of bacterial DNA 12 . These findings support the “retrograde theory” proposed by Marchal et al postulating that food, bacteria, and foreign objects migrate from the oral cavity to the salivary duct, and that biofilms could be responsible for stone formation 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In another study, 15 salivary stones from 12 patients were examined for the presence of bacteria using optical and scanning electron microscopy, and qPCR revealed the presence of bacterial DNA 12 . These findings support the “retrograde theory” proposed by Marchal et al postulating that food, bacteria, and foreign objects migrate from the oral cavity to the salivary duct, and that biofilms could be responsible for stone formation 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Obstruction of the salivary duct due to sialolithiasis is the most frequent etiology of sialadenitis. Hence patients with sialolithiasis can have acute pain due to sialadenitis[6] and this was consistent with most of our cases.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, as reported in the literature [ 5 ], the submandibular was by far more involved compared to the parotid gland. Most (44%) sialoliths were found to be in the hilus of the gland or in the proximal duct system (27%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
