2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(20000110)416:2<188::aid-cne5>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal projections throughout optic nerve regeneration in the ornate dragon lizard,Ctenophorus ornatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) and the crush site after only 3 weeks (Dobson, ), which is similar in timing (1 month) to that observed at the crush site of C. ornatus (Dunlop et al. ). Interestingly, the RGC survival capacity in both lizard species was similar (around 70%) despite the fact that transected RGC axons in G. galloti took 6–9 months to reach the optic tectum, which is a considerable delay when compared with the 2 months that crushed axons took in C. ornatus (Lang et al.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) and the crush site after only 3 weeks (Dobson, ), which is similar in timing (1 month) to that observed at the crush site of C. ornatus (Dunlop et al. ). Interestingly, the RGC survival capacity in both lizard species was similar (around 70%) despite the fact that transected RGC axons in G. galloti took 6–9 months to reach the optic tectum, which is a considerable delay when compared with the 2 months that crushed axons took in C. ornatus (Lang et al.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…; Dunlop et al. ). These two axotomy methods offer complementary views of spontaneous central nervous system (CNS) axonal regeneration capacity in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar to V. aspis and G. galloti, axons penetrated the lesion site and reached the contralateral optic tectum but did so more rapidly -that is, by one to two months; regenerating fibers also formed more robust projections compared to V. aspis and G. galloti (Rio et al, 1989;Dunlop et al, 2000;Lang et al, 2002). Figs.…”
Section: % Inmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These obstacles are (1) scar tissue formation after tissue injury [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], (2) gaps in nervous tissue formed during phagocytosis of dying cells after injury [17,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28], (3) factors that inhibit axon growth in the mature mammalian CNS [15,17,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], and (4) failure of many adult neurons to initiate axonal extension [17,[22][23][24][25][26]29,31,35,36]. Through reducing or overcoming the first two and possibly the first three of the barriers described above and creating a permissive environment for axonal regrowth using a synthetic biologic nanomaterial, with components that break down into beneficial building blocks and produce no adverse effects in the CNS, functional behavioral recovery becomes a reality.…”
Section: Second P: Creating a Permissive Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%