2000
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.118.12.1661
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Retinal Detachment in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
83
31
10
1

Citation Types

7
91
3
0

Year Published

Range
2002
2002
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
95
18
2

Relationship

0
115

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 115 publications

(101 citation statements)
references

References 6 publications

7
91
3
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…5 However, unlike in our study, in the EVS, there were higher rates of RD with more virulent organisms, specifically gram-negative organisms or gram-positive cocci other than coagulase negative micrococci. 5 Chiquet et al, Wang et al, and Lee et al also did not report any relationship between organisms and RD rates. 6,11,20 In this review, 21 (66%) of the RD cases occurred within the first month after endophthalmitis diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 93%
“…In the EVS and in our review, the frequency of detachment was higher with poorer visual acuity at endophthalmitis presentation. 5 However, unlike in our study, in the EVS, there were higher rates of RD with more virulent organisms, specifically gram-negative organisms or gram-positive cocci other than coagulase negative micrococci. 5 Chiquet et al, Wang et al, and Lee et al also did not report any relationship between organisms and RD rates.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 93%
“…As visual acuity at presentation has been shown to be a risk factor for subsequent RD, this difference may explain the lower rate of RD in the EVS. 5 The rate of RD in our investigation is congruent with the range of 7% to 34% reported by previous studies. [3][4][5][6]19,20 The large variation in rates of RD is likely as a result of different inclusion criteria of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…5 The rate of RD in our investigation is congruent with the range of 7% to 34% reported by previous studies. [3][4][5][6]19,20 The large variation in rates of RD is likely as a result of different inclusion criteria of previous studies. Table 6 summarizes the current literature pertaining to RD post endophthalmitis.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations