2014
DOI: 10.5539/ies.v7n2p37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Mindscapes and Symbols of Patriarchy in the Workforce to Explain Gendered Privileges and Rewards

Abstract: In this article the authors contend that gender inequalities in occupational divisions of labor are better understood in reference to the concept of symbolic patriarchy. The conceptual framework is informed by social constructionist theories that view gender not merely in light of sexual or biological differences but as interwoven, fluid, and contesting boundaries of authority. The goal here is to locate the labyrinths of power and unequal treatment of women, evidenced through the "gender pay gap" and derived … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to reject the concept of patriarchy, either as being a structuralist narrative (Pollert, 1996), abstract (Gottfried, 1998) or as reinforcing dualism of production and reproduction (Acker, 1989) do not explain the prevalence of gender distinctions and male domination in all known societies, at all times (Kimmel, 2000). Any analysis of capitalism without accounting for patriarchy would be incomplete (Cockburn, 2012;Brenner and Holmstrom, 2013;Gimenez, 2005;Fuchs, 2018;Kocabıçak, 2013;Omvedt, 1986;Paltasingh and Lingam, 2014;Pogoson, 2018;Semali and Shakespeare, 2014;Tepe-Belfrage and Steans, 2016;Velaskar, 2016). In order to move beyond male domination in the sphere of family, Cockburn (1981, p. 55) conceptualizes "andrarchy" to explain the all-pervasive male domination over females, whether inside the family or outside the family, inside the workplace or outside the workplace, through both ideological and material practices.…”
Section: Gender and Labour Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to reject the concept of patriarchy, either as being a structuralist narrative (Pollert, 1996), abstract (Gottfried, 1998) or as reinforcing dualism of production and reproduction (Acker, 1989) do not explain the prevalence of gender distinctions and male domination in all known societies, at all times (Kimmel, 2000). Any analysis of capitalism without accounting for patriarchy would be incomplete (Cockburn, 2012;Brenner and Holmstrom, 2013;Gimenez, 2005;Fuchs, 2018;Kocabıçak, 2013;Omvedt, 1986;Paltasingh and Lingam, 2014;Pogoson, 2018;Semali and Shakespeare, 2014;Tepe-Belfrage and Steans, 2016;Velaskar, 2016). In order to move beyond male domination in the sphere of family, Cockburn (1981, p. 55) conceptualizes "andrarchy" to explain the all-pervasive male domination over females, whether inside the family or outside the family, inside the workplace or outside the workplace, through both ideological and material practices.…”
Section: Gender and Labour Processmentioning
confidence: 99%