2000
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2968
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Resuscitation After Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation With Use of Monophasic and Biphasic Waveform Pulses for External Defibrillation

Abstract: Background-Survival after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) appears severely limited by 2 major factors: (1) low defibrillation success rates and (2) persistent post-countershock myocardial dysfunction. Biphasic (BP) waveforms may prove capable of favorably modifying these limitations. However, they have not been rigorously tested against monophasic (MP) waveforms in clinical models of external defibrillation, particularly where rescue from prolonged VF is the general rule. Methods and Results-We randomi… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
59
12
2
0

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

Range
1999
1999
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
64
4
2

Relationship

2
68

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 70 publications

(42 citation statements)
references

References 30 publications

0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…BP waveforms may rescue victims who might otherwise have failed defibrillation with conventional MP waveforms. In addition, the lower energy BP countershocks may produce less myocardial injury and mechanical dysfunction than equally effective MP countershocks 18 . We found that the shock energy level for E80 of a BP waveform was 30% less than that of an MP waveform, implying that BP defibrillation was more effective than MP defibrillation.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 78%