2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110492385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that Ta does not agree on φ‐features with its antecedent (see (4)). I argue accordingly that Ta bears uninterpretable and unvalued defective φ‐features, which only serve to activate the element for syntactic operations (see also Pan 2016). Besides the [u‐φ(def)] features, Ta independently bears a valued ID feature.…”
Section: Wdc Ta: a Resumptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recall that Ta does not agree on φ‐features with its antecedent (see (4)). I argue accordingly that Ta bears uninterpretable and unvalued defective φ‐features, which only serve to activate the element for syntactic operations (see also Pan 2016). Besides the [u‐φ(def)] features, Ta independently bears a valued ID feature.…”
Section: Wdc Ta: a Resumptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is, however, not the case for MC. In MC, all the resumptive pronouns take the form of regular referential pronouns with a full set of φ‐features (see Pan 2016).…”
Section: Wdc Ta: a Resumptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the L2ers were tested only in English, which means that we cannot know for certain how they would have performed in their L1. This is an important limitation because the facts regarding the acceptability of resumption in Korean (and Mandarin) are still not well understood (see Keenan & Comrie, 1977;Kwon, 2008;Pan, 2016;Song, 2003), and also because it is possible that there is variation between speakers with the same L1. This problem will be addressed moving forward by testing the L2ers in their L1 as well as the TL, at least for the AJT.…”
Section: Environment Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pan himself identifies many additional syntactic and semantic constraints on using RPs in Chinese (Pan, 2016a: 3, footnote 2), suggesting that it can fit Type II (for a more detailed description of the constraints identified by Pan, see the respective section). Additionally, some languages can show both grammatical and intrusive RPs simultaneously, which invalidates this macro-variation classification (Pan, 2016b). It should not be ignored that, when they are realized as pronouns, RPs 'are pronouns (at least in their apparent form)' (McCloskey, 2006: 96).…”
Section: Introduction 1 Filler-gap Dependencies and Resumptive Pronou...mentioning
confidence: 99%