2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restriction of dietary protein leads to conditioned protein preference and elevated palatability of protein-containing food in rats

Abstract: The mechanisms by which intake of dietary protein is regulated are poorly understood despite their potential involvement in determining food choice and appetite. In particular, it is unclear whether protein deficiency results in a specific appetite for protein and whether influences on diet are immediate or develop over time. To determine the effects of protein restriction on consumption, preference, and palatability for protein we assessed patterns of intake for casein (protein) and maltodextrin (carbohydrate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(32 reference statements)
9
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When performed at adulthood, protein restriction did not affect rats' weight, consistent with our previous results [11]. Adult animals have lower protein requirements compared to adolescents, who are rapidly growing and developing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When performed at adulthood, protein restriction did not affect rats' weight, consistent with our previous results [11]. Adult animals have lower protein requirements compared to adolescents, who are rapidly growing and developing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We first investigated the impact of protein restriction (PR) during either adolescence or adulthood on weight and weight gain ( Figure 1C). As we previously observed [11], protein restriction at adulthood did not significantly affect either the weight of rats (two-way repeated measures ANOVA: Diet F(1,13) = 0.5, p = 0.5; Day F(11, 143) = 85.5, p < 0.001; Diet x Day F(11, 143)= 0.4, p = 1.0) or weight gain (NR: +48 g ± 6 / PR: +40 g ± 6; Diet t(13) = 0.9, p = 0.4). In contrast, protein restriction during adolescence significantly decreased weight gain, relative to control diet (Diet F(1,11) = 19.8, p < 0.001; Day F(13, 143) = 478.7, p < 0.001; Diet x Day F(13, 143)= 234.0, p < 0.001).…”
Section: Age Dependent Impact Of Protein Restriction On Weightsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations