2004
Restricted Visiting Hours in ICUs
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
166
26
25
4
Citation Types
1
143
1
17
Year Published
1970
2026
Publication Types
Select...
189
13
3
1
Relationship
0
206
Authors
Journals
Cited by 204 publications
(162 citation statements)
References 3 publications
1
143
1
17
“…Consistent with previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] our results revealed that visitor behavior was frequently associated with a decreased risk of patient harm. For example, we found that visitor communication with staff was most frequently reported as decreasing risk of harm and was distributed across all seven event types.…”
Section: Implications Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with previous studies, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] our results revealed that visitor behavior was frequently associated with a decreased risk of patient harm. For example, we found that visitor communication with staff was most frequently reported as decreasing risk of harm and was distributed across all seven event types.…”
Section: Implications Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Berwick and Kotagal (2004) showed that open visiting hours gain the trust of the families. 16 This contradicts the results of this study where the families participating in the study believed that they trust nurses in ICU regardless of restrictive visiting hours. It seems that this difference in opinions may be due to geographical environment and location of the hospital and governing socio-cultural differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Despite evidence that flexible visitation improves communication and satisfaction, reduces anxiety and delirium, and does not meaningfully increase security incidents or compromise infection control (1,4,5,10,37,38), visiting windows varied widely in our sample. The heterogeneity suggests hospitals balance competing priorities, including patient experience, impact on staff, and operational efficiency, rather than converging on a single optimal policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
