2019
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Coercive practices, such as physical restraint, are used globally to respond to violent, aggressive and other behaviours displayed by mental health service users.1 A number of approaches have been designed to aid staff working within services to minimise the use of restraint and other restrictive practices. One such approach, the ‘REsTRAIN Yourself’ (RYS) initiative, has been evaluated in the UK. Rapid ethnography was used to explore the aspects of organisational culture and staff behaviour exhibited by teams … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in line with previous studies which employed observational techniques and also reported a general lack of engagement on acute wards (Altschul 1972; McKeown et al . 2019a; Quirk & Lelliott 2001). Barker and Buchanan‐Barker (2005) highlight the importance of time when developing nurse–patient relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in line with previous studies which employed observational techniques and also reported a general lack of engagement on acute wards (Altschul 1972; McKeown et al . 2019a; Quirk & Lelliott 2001). Barker and Buchanan‐Barker (2005) highlight the importance of time when developing nurse–patient relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have also demonstrated mental health staff engaging in legitimation narratives both on a collective and individual basis with respect to restrictive practices (Gadsby 2018; McKeown et al . 2020; Perkins et al . 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, McKeown et al . (2020) recently reported mental health staff claiming various forms of justification for the use of restraint, such as patients from certain populations and protection of staff and other patients. The study also described that ‘rationalising restraint as a legitimate, last resort intervention both vindicated staff actions, and condoled those who would rather not administer coercive practices’ (p. 454).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the patients, along the line of the nurses in previous studies, observed that the spaces for interactions should be comfortable and ensure privacy (Staniszewska et al, 2019). However, patients also identified certain barriers to building such spaces, such as the lengthy periods of time nurses spend doing administrative work (McKeown et al, 2020; Reavey et al, 2019). Consequently, the characteristics that participants highlighted as important are in line with the characteristics that previous studies assign to person‐centred care (Byrne et al, 2020; Moreno‐Poyato & Rodríguez‐Nogueira, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%