Restoration of temperate marine and coastal ecosystems: nudging nature

Abstract

1. The main impacts on marine ecosystems are summarised and the potential for their restoration is discussed in relation to their key features. Rocky shores, seagrass beds and disused docks are focused on. 2. The term restoration is used to describe intervention in the recovery process of a marine ecosystem, with a view to enhancing the process, but not necessarily forcing the system to recover to its original condition. 3. Rocky shore systems are subject to shellfish and seaweed exploitation, point source pollution, diffuse impacts such as tributyl tin and acute impacts such as oil spills. The consideration of whether to employ restoration or allow natural recovery is discussed in relation to these systems. 4. Seagrass systems have suffered serious declines in many parts of the world due to the direct and indirect effects of human impacts. In the North Atlantic a wasting disease first noted in the 1930s caused a serious decline in the subtidal seagrass Zostera marina. The link between this disease and the marine slime mould Labrynthula zosterae is now well established. Human impacts on seagrass systems allow the disease to gain a foothold. Attempts at restoring seagrass beds have met with some success, but it is suggested that the action of conservation of remaining beds and better management of human activities may be the best approach. 5. Disused docks occur in many parts of Britain and Europe. Active management of the physical environment by mixing and biomanipulation by filter feeding organisms have led to improvements in water quality and ecosystem function. Thus healthy marine ecosystems have been restored to inner city areas, although these artificial marine lakes have few natural equivalents and are different from the original ecosystem at the site. 6. When compared to freshwater ecosystems, the scope for coastal and marine restoration is limited although the capacity for recovery is greater. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Learning from the past: functional ecology of marine benthos during eight million years of aperiodic hypoxia, lessons from the Late Jurassic

“…Therefore, short/intermittent periods of hypoxia do not appear to result in a collapse of benthic ecological functioning. Contemporary studies of a variety of anthropogenic impacts, including organic enrichment, have also shown continued delivery of many ecological functions, even under reduced species richness, and recovery following cessation of the impacting activity (Hawkins et al 1999, Rosenberg et al 2002, Rees et al 2006, Palumbi et al 2008, Birchenough and Frid 2009, Frid 2011, Villnäs et al 2012). Ecological functioning is conserved in the face of ‘mild’ perturbations with species replacements acting to maintain the total pool of traits and hence ecological functions/roles (Villnäs et al 2012).…”

Coastal greening of grey infrastructure: an update on the state-of-the-art

“…As part of the process water quality needs to be improved. The encouragement of native mussels increased natural biofiltration which improved water quality (Figure 6c, Wilkinson et al, 1996) and led to colonisation of diverse assemblage of marine life (Allen et al, 1995;Hawkins et al, 1999;Firth et al, 2023b). Artificial water circulation further enhanced water movement and quality.…”

Playing to the Positives: Using Synergies to Enhance Kelp Forest Restoration

“…Overharvesting can be a straightforward fix in systems that contain wild harvest industries (e.g., Chile, France, Japan), and appropriate management that regulates kelp extraction can allow for populations to return (Fujita, 2011;Buschmann et al, 2014;Frangoudes and Garineaud, 2015). Enhancing the water quality in an area can also slow kelp loss or sometimes allow it to return (Hawkins et al, 1999). While kelp restoration is not usually a focal motivation for implementing marine protected areas (MPAs) (Woodcock et al, 2017), MPA restrictions may limit the harvest of certain marine predators that can help control herbivore population and thus their installation may promote the resilience of kelp ecosystems (Ferrari et al, 2018).…”