Responses of stream macroinvertebrates and ecosystem function to conventional, integrated and organic farming

Abstract

Summary1. Organic farming practices can benefit a wide range of terrestrial biota in comparison to conventional farming but we do not know whether this benefit extends to streams flowing through farmed landscapes. 2. We measured the impacts of organic, integrated management and conventional farming on the taxonomic and trait composition of macroinvertebrate communities and on stream ecosystem functioning (algal accrual on tiles and leaf breakdown). Our study design included five replicates of each farming practice, arranged in blocks, in agricultural land dedicated to the farming of sheep and beef cattle on pasture in southern New Zealand. In each farm stream, we studied both upstream and downstream reaches within the farm's boundaries. 3. The different farming practices were reflected in contrasting stream physicochemistry (total dissolved nitrogen, fine sediment on the bed and glyphosate concentrations in the bed sediment) and in differences in both the taxonomic organization and trait representation of stream invertebrate communities. Conventional farm streams showed the strongest negative responses, whilst the condition of organic and integrated farm streams was similar. 4. Invertebrate trait measures proved as effective as taxonomic measures in their response to agricultural intensity, whereas ecosystem function measures were least sensitive. 5. There were no overall physicochemical differences between upstream and downstream sites within the farms and few notable longitudinal patterns in ecological response variables. 6. Synthesis and applications. Conventional farming had the strongest adverse consequences for stream condition in our study. In contrast, an integrated management system (aimed at reducing pesticide use, increasing beneficial pest predators and encouraging environmentally responsible soil, water and energy management) proved at least as effective as organic farming and, together with organic farming, can be considered better practice.

Influence of hydrological regime and land cover on traits and potential export capacity of adult aquatic insects from river channels

“…This exchange of resources can subsidise different trophic levels (Marczak et al 2007), alter species interactions and community composition in both systems (Baxter et al 2005;Marcarelli et al 2011;Nakano and Murakami 2001) and influence food web stability (Huxel and McCann 1998). As a consequence, changes within one ecosystem are likely to affect the structure and function of adjacent ecosystems.…”

Are Organic Standards Sufficient to Ensure Sustainable Agriculture? Lessons From New Zealand’s ARGOS and Sustainability Dashboard Projects

“…Outcomes from these IM growers are sometimes quite different from so-called "conventional' farmers. For example, in the ARGOS project, macoinvertebrate communities and ecosystem functioning were negatively impacted in streams running through conventional sheep/beef farms, but there was no evidence of them being different in Organic and IM farms (Magbanua et al, 2010).…”

The Potential of P Loss from Livestock Farms to Watercourses in Wensleydale; A Risk Mapping Approach

“…Jarvie [10] highlighted the small relative contribution of PP derived from agriculture to water eutrophication in lowland rivers in comparison with sewage effluent sources. Therefore SRP desorption from sediment particles represents an ecological risk in individual reaches of rivers where SRP concentrations are low at times of eutrophication risk [4,10,75].…”

“…Several published studies have demonstrated the impact of diffuse agricultural pollution on rivers ecological functions as a result of poor water quality [1][2][3][4].…”