2002
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to levodopa in parkinsonian patients with bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation

Abstract: The response to levodopa changes over time in Parkinson's disease, probably due to alterations in the dopaminergic system, progression of the disease and pulsatile oral intake of the drug. Bilateral high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) allows a large reduction or the complete cessation of levodopa intake in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. We studied variation in the motor short-duration response (SDR) during a levodopa challenge in bilaterally STN-stimulated patients. Twenty-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
40
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, comparing the MED-ON/STIM-ON scores with the preoperative MED-ON, a significant improvement was observed only at 1 year; at 11 years, all symptoms except rigidity significantly worsened. A reduced magnitude of the response to levodopa was noticed also for symptoms usually considered drug-responsive, and this could have different explanations: during the follow-up patients were taking a levodopa amount smaller than in the preoperative, and this could affect the response to levodopa challenge [14]; chronic STN-DBS could affect the magnitude of levodopa response, probably due to long-term plastic changes of the dopaminergic system [15]; the quality of levodopa responsiveness deteriorates over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparing the MED-ON/STIM-ON scores with the preoperative MED-ON, a significant improvement was observed only at 1 year; at 11 years, all symptoms except rigidity significantly worsened. A reduced magnitude of the response to levodopa was noticed also for symptoms usually considered drug-responsive, and this could have different explanations: during the follow-up patients were taking a levodopa amount smaller than in the preoperative, and this could affect the response to levodopa challenge [14]; chronic STN-DBS could affect the magnitude of levodopa response, probably due to long-term plastic changes of the dopaminergic system [15]; the quality of levodopa responsiveness deteriorates over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that, in this condition, none of the patients showed an intensity of tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity of the right hand that might compromise performance in the various tasks. It should also be considered that med-off and med-off/stimoff represent typical conditions for testing PD patients in both experimental and clinical contexts (Alberts et al, 2008;Funkiewiez et al, 2006;Schupbach et al, 2005;Moro, Esselink, Benabid, & Pollak, 2002).…”
Section: General Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group consisted of two women and seven men, who at the time of operation had a mean age of 59.5 yr (range: 55-67) and a mean duration of PD of 10.7 Ϯ 3.7 (mean Ϯ SD) years. All patients were assessed preoperatively using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (Fahn et al 1987) before and after an acute levodopa challenge (Moro et al 2002). During surgery, the patients were awake and off dopaminergic medications for Ն12 h from the last oral dose of antiparkinsonian medications.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%