2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52250-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surface Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of independent variables on Cu extraction rates from leaching of chalcocite were studied using the response surface optimization method [32][33][34][35]. The central composite face (CCF) design and a quadratic model were applied to the experimental design for Cu 2 S leaching.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of independent variables on Cu extraction rates from leaching of chalcocite were studied using the response surface optimization method [32][33][34][35]. The central composite face (CCF) design and a quadratic model were applied to the experimental design for Cu 2 S leaching.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant differences were found among any of the replicate means (p > 0.05), and the data for the different replicates were therefore averaged (Dean & Voss 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu extraction rates was studied through the effects of time and chloride and H 2 SO 4 concentrations variables on leaching covellite [37][38][39][40]. An experimental design was carried out considering three levels per factor, resulting in a total of 27 samples [41].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%