2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of strontium titanate to ion and electron irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental phization dose at room temperature is below 2 dpa [12,14,16]. In our present study, no amorphous is observed in irradiated SrTiO 3 even at 5 dpa.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experimental phization dose at room temperature is below 2 dpa [12,14,16]. In our present study, no amorphous is observed in irradiated SrTiO 3 even at 5 dpa.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…The potential materials for immobilization of nuclear waste must be able to endure extreme radiation environment associated with α-decay of the actinides and β-decay of the fission products. In the previous studies, several research groups have performed ion beam irradiations on SrTiO 3 to study its radiation tolerance [12][13][14][15][16]. An irradiation-induced crystalline to amorphous phase transformation was observed on SrTiO 3 , and quantitatively studies on the critical dose and temperature for amorphization were already reported [12,14,16].…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small shift of damage profile of ϳ5% resulting from relatively lower stopping power of channeled He ions has been observed in slightly damaged SrTiO 3 . 54 Since this study mainly focuses on heavily damaged SiC samples, such channeling effects on the He stopping power will be ignored.…”
Section: He Stopping In Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 The corresponding damage peak at ϳ55 nm was determined experimentally. The SRIM predicted damage peak is at 39 nm, much shallower than the experimental results with a difference close to 29%.…”
Section: Stopping Of Slow Heavy Ions In Srtio 3 Gan and Alnmentioning
confidence: 99%