“…The dependence of primates on their plant food sources might lead them to show patterns of habitat use, that reflect the spatial distribution (frequently clumped) of their preferred foods [e.g., ripe fruits and young leaves: Hopkins, ; Milton, ; van Schaik et al, ; Zimmerman et al, ]. This dependence explains why seasonal variations in fruit supply had a stronger influence on the spatial distribution of the highly frugivorous Ateles belzebuth , than on the less frugivorous Cebus olivaceus and Alouatta macconnelli (Mourthé, ). However, the frequent use of indirect estimators of food availability [e.g., tree species richness, vegetation type, and basal area of preferred food sources; see Anzures‐Dadda & Manson, ; Gómez‐Posada, Martínez, Giraldo, & Kattan, ; Hopkins, ; Thomas, ] have limited the power for testing how within‐site spatiotemporal differences in habitat quality influence primate spatial distribution, group size, and abundance, because they measure “potential,” not necessarily actual food availability.…”