1969
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.6.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of cutaneous sensory units with unmyelinated fibers to noxious stimuli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
357
3
10

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 934 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
25
357
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented here and elsewhere (Thut et al 2003), HT cool neurons also differ from LT cool neurons in the threshold and kinetics of their responses to cooling, cell body size, and IB4 binding. The notion that there are distinct populations of sensory neurons responsive to a decrease in temperature is consistent with electrophysiological and psychophysical studies, suggesting that at least two unique populations of cold-sensitive neurons exist in vivo: one population that is responsive to innocuous cooling and a second responsive to noxious cold (Bessou and Perl 1969;Darian-Smith et al 1973;Georgopoulos 1976;Iggo 1969). LT cool neurons and HT cool neurons may therefore represent cool fibers and cold nociceptors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…As presented here and elsewhere (Thut et al 2003), HT cool neurons also differ from LT cool neurons in the threshold and kinetics of their responses to cooling, cell body size, and IB4 binding. The notion that there are distinct populations of sensory neurons responsive to a decrease in temperature is consistent with electrophysiological and psychophysical studies, suggesting that at least two unique populations of cold-sensitive neurons exist in vivo: one population that is responsive to innocuous cooling and a second responsive to noxious cold (Bessou and Perl 1969;Darian-Smith et al 1973;Georgopoulos 1976;Iggo 1969). LT cool neurons and HT cool neurons may therefore represent cool fibers and cold nociceptors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The increase in peak discharge rate with stimulus ramp rate indicates a higher sensitivity to fast temperature changes and has usually been related to the phasic response characteristics of nociceptors. In summary, heat conduction to the receptor and the phasic response characteristics of nociceptors explain the apparent paradox described by Bessou & Perl (1969). Correlations between psychophysical measures of heat pain threshold and neurophysiological results Unlike CMH thresholds, human pain thresholds decrease as stimulus ramp rate increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Although the spots were detected at temperatures served by cold fibers and warm fibers, it has been assumed that sensations of burning, stinging or pricking arise from stimulation of nociceptors, which by definition have high thresholds and respond to noxious stimulation (Bessou and Perl 1969;Iggo and Ogawa 1971). The test temperatures of 28° and 36°C were specifically chosen to avoid stimulation of C-polymodal nociceptors (CPNs), which have average cold thresholds below 20°C (Simone and Kajander 1996;Campero et al 1996) and average heat thresholds above 40°C (Bessou and Perl 1969;Van Hees and Gybels 1981;Yarnitsky et al 1992). However, Georgopoulos (1976) reported a few Aδ-and C-mechano-thermal nociceptors in primates that were unusually sensitive to cold, with some having thresholds as high as 30°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%