2018
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.033968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response by Magnussen et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Sex Differences and Similarities in Atrial Fibrillation Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Mortality in Community Cohorts: Results From the BiomarCaRE Consortium (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe)”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
78
1
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
12
78
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is an abundance of literature to support the relationship between NT-pro-BNP and the risk of AF, sex-specific effects have only sparsely been reported 8 9 25. Recently, the BiomarCaRE consortium showed that increases in NT-pro-BNP conferred an 11% greater excess risk of AF in women than men 11. Although this sex difference was not statistically significant in BiomarCaRE, it is directionally consistent with the 22% greater excess risk of AF in women than men associated with NT-pro-BNP reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is an abundance of literature to support the relationship between NT-pro-BNP and the risk of AF, sex-specific effects have only sparsely been reported 8 9 25. Recently, the BiomarCaRE consortium showed that increases in NT-pro-BNP conferred an 11% greater excess risk of AF in women than men 11. Although this sex difference was not statistically significant in BiomarCaRE, it is directionally consistent with the 22% greater excess risk of AF in women than men associated with NT-pro-BNP reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…More recently, several inflammatory, cardiac, and renal markers have also been associated with the risk of AF,8–10 although the evidence is inconsistent and often not provided separately for women and men. However, the BiomarCaRE consortium recently demonstrated that there are sex differences in the association between some, mostly classical, risk factors and the risk of AF 11. Robust evidence on the existence of sex differences in risk factors for AF would provide new insights in the sex-specific aetiology of AF and could provide an impetus to take such differences into account in clinical guidelines, clinical decision-making, and health promotion efforts 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Only 3 of the included studies, however, provided sex-specific estimates. 36 37 Therefore, the current study adds to the body of knowledge by comprehensively determining sex differences in the impact of BMI on future incident AF (including providing BMI-specific HRs) and confirms that associations between BMI and future development of AF are significant in both sexes but differ in size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The MB-LATER score good predictive ability for VLRAF could be partly explained by higher AF prevalence in men. 40,41…”
Section: Mb-latermentioning
confidence: 99%