2022
DOI: 10.3390/pediatric14020021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs of General Practitioners from North-Eastern Italy (2021)

Abstract: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a lead cause of morbidity and hospitalizations in infants. RSV vaccines are currently under development, and preventive options are limited to monoclonal antibodies (mAb). We assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices for RSV in a sample of general practitioners (GPs) from north-eastern Italy (2021), focusing on the risk perception for infants (age < 8 years) and its potential effectors. We administered an internet survey to 543 GPs, with a response rate of 28.9%. K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not, however, assess whether barriers to access, ecologic factors, race, or parent and/or provider characteristics were associated with suboptimal coverage of this high-risk population of very preterm infants, and future research on the barriers to palivizumab administration is needed. 31 , 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not, however, assess whether barriers to access, ecologic factors, race, or parent and/or provider characteristics were associated with suboptimal coverage of this high-risk population of very preterm infants, and future research on the barriers to palivizumab administration is needed. 31 , 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the unprecedented surge of RSV during 2021–2022 has reclaimed the interest of both medical research and traditional media [ 3 , 19 , 24 , 68 ]. Interestingly, some previous reports from Italian parents have stressed a limited knowledge of this pathogen [ 2 , 69 ]. Therefore, we cannot rule out that these research peaks may be the indirect consequence of the higher interest of the general population towards something otherwise perceived as uncommon and unfamiliar, rather than representing a proxy of the RSV circulation among the targeted population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned critical issue represented by the limited representativity of ILI for actual RSV cases, our study is affected by several other limits that should be accurately addressed. First and foremost, although the InfluNet surveillance network has been designed in order to provide estimates that could be acknowledged as representative of the general Italian population [ 19 , 22 , 24 , 51 , 84 ], its original design specifically targeted influenza and influenza-like syndromes, and it can deliberately miss LRTIs because of its clinical features, which are far more representative of RSV than ILI themselves [ 1 , 2 , 20 , 29 , 85 ]. In this regard, it should be stressed that while the European data have identified a certain circulation of RSV at the national level, even after the end of conventional surveillance for ILI, Italy did not extend the surveillance season in 2020–2021 or in 2021–2022, compromising the capability of the InfluNet to properly track down RSV infections [ 58 , 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, the retrieved articles were of mixed quality, and quite heterogenous in terms of design and overall size. Even though the estimates were reasonably free from small study effects and publication bias, it should be stressed that RSV has been often and improperly regarded as a somewhat “minor” pathogen, and also medical professionals still fail to understand the severity of RSV infections in infants and adults [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Therefore, the large majority of incident cases simply remains undiagnosed [ 5 , 52 , 53 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%