1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
6
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
98
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Three parameters have been proposed to evaluate crop water flow resistance: Manning's roughness coefficient n, the Chezy factor C, and the Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient f. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the three methods of measuring water flow resistance have been considered by several researchers. Abrahams et al (1994) found Darcy-Weisbach coefficient better than the Manning's coefficient because it can be applied to different flow states. Noarayanan et al (2012) tested Manning's roughness coefficient under different water flow conditions and plant parameters and concluded that Manning's roughness coefficient is ideal for calculating and describing surface shallow flow resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three parameters have been proposed to evaluate crop water flow resistance: Manning's roughness coefficient n, the Chezy factor C, and the Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient f. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the three methods of measuring water flow resistance have been considered by several researchers. Abrahams et al (1994) found Darcy-Weisbach coefficient better than the Manning's coefficient because it can be applied to different flow states. Noarayanan et al (2012) tested Manning's roughness coefficient under different water flow conditions and plant parameters and concluded that Manning's roughness coefficient is ideal for calculating and describing surface shallow flow resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are likely to change markedly with increases in global temperatures, increases in the severity of high intensity rainfall events, and greater spatial variability in groundcover and therefore the capacity of the soil to resist erosion. The replacement of grassland by shrubland exposes more of the surface to the action of raindrop impact resulting in accelerated erosion and potential sedimentation (Abrahams et al, 1994). These regional studies reinforce the notion that more catchment-specific data are needed for both the ecological (e.g., tree rooting depth, canopy architecture and structure, depth of water intake) and hydrological (soil texture and hydraulic conductivity, soil moisture availability, hydrological connectivity) components of these systems, in order to improve our catchment wide modeling of the likely ecohydrological effects of vegetation change.…”
Section: The Effects On Regional Hydrological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, removal of fallen litter from mowed plots likely caused similar litter coverage in both treatments, and litter coverage is an important factor influencing resistance to shallow overland flow generated by surface inflows and nonrainfall conditions (Engman 1986;Abrahams et al 1994).…”
Section: Influence Of Mowed Buffers On Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%