2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2020.2992646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient H Consensus-Based Control of Autonomous AC Microgrids With Uncertain Time-Delayed Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time delay of the FOPID input signal may cause the controller malfunction [58]. To avoid this problem, the controller must have the necessary robustness against time delay uncertainty.…”
Section: ) Uncertainty Of Time Delay Of Input Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time delay of the FOPID input signal may cause the controller malfunction [58]. To avoid this problem, the controller must have the necessary robustness against time delay uncertainty.…”
Section: ) Uncertainty Of Time Delay Of Input Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this control approach strongly depends on the system parameters, which technically restrict its application and undesirable effects for nonlinear loads. Moreover, a two‐stage robust optimization model for flexible operation of MGs, which is a hierarchical based frequency control technique and formulated in Reference 99 and 126. Although, MG operating cost is minimum, primary and secondary control levels are used to restrict frequency deviations and avoid load shedding under the worst case of the islanded mode 80,100 …”
Section: Microgrid Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to enhance the power system stability for any load conditions is investigated in References 99 and 87. Transient response enhancing the performance of this control technique among paralleled VSC in MG has been addressed in Reference 66.…”
Section: Microgrid Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the SoC of BESSs, the coulomb counting rule will help. The simplified coulomb rule can be expressed as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptSoCi=SoC0i1Ciηiidcdt Due to the SoC estimation of the BESSs in the MG, we neglect the power loss of the interfacing voltage source converter (VSC) and assume that the output voltages of the batteries are the same as [15, 20, 22]. Regarding the conservation of energy in the output and input of the VSC, there exists an approximation for each BESS ( PPdc=vdcidc), and the efficiency factor is supposed to be unit ( η=1).…”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], the impact of the inherent time delay based on distributed secondary frequency control is investigated, and the delay margins are obtained. In [22], the resilient H consensus‐based control has been proposed for uncertain time‐delayed communication. Furthermore, in [23], a distributed secondary scheme has been presented for DG‐based MG in which, the weighted average value of voltage, frequency regulating, and power sharing with time‐varying delays is presented, but in this case all the communication links have the same time‐varying delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%