2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual lifetime prediction for lithium-ion battery based on functional principal component analysis and Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inverse Gaussian process was used to analyze the accelerated degradation model and both the Jeffreys prior and reference prior were derived and compared [18]. Based on the functional principal component analysis (PCA) and the Bayesian method, a new prediction method for Li ion battery residual lifetime evaluation was presented [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse Gaussian process was used to analyze the accelerated degradation model and both the Jeffreys prior and reference prior were derived and compared [18]. Based on the functional principal component analysis (PCA) and the Bayesian method, a new prediction method for Li ion battery residual lifetime evaluation was presented [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…| • stands for the conditional to all the variables related to it and it should include all the terms that have from (4). Also, N, G, B, and R refer to normal, gamma, beta, and Rayleigh PDFs, respectively.…”
Section: B Mathematical Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data-driven methods are mostly used for realtime applications and after training through a set of data, they use present measurement data from the battery to predict the battery state of health (SOH). Different types of Kalman filters (KF) [2], relevance vector machine (RVM) [3] and functional principal component analyses (FPCA) [4] are some of these methods. These methods need expert knowledge to relate the available data to the battery health condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the model-based methods, the data-driven methods are based on large numbers of data, where the deep understanding of electrochemical principles is not necessary [18]. It mainly includes the support vector machine [19][20][21], neural network [22,23], Bayesian method [24,25], random forest [26] and so on. For data-driven methods, the effectiveness of features and the performance of regression algorithms can greatly affect the accuracy of the RUL prediction, so they have attracted the attention of many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%