2020
DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.07.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resident Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Appendectomy According to Seniority

Abstract: Purpose: This study sought to delineate the learning curve (LC) for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in surgical residency according to seniority and experience.Methods: Between October 2015 and November 2016, 150 patients underwent LA performed by one of 3 residents (who were in their first [A], second [B], or third [C] year of training) under supervision. The patients were nonrandomly assigned to each resident. Data from a prospectively collected database were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Great heterogeneity in the learning curve assessment was noted; six studies described the chronological distribution in groups and their evaluation [ 21 26 ]; one study used the moving average method [ 27 ]; two studies used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis [ 20 , 28 ]; two studies adopted both the moving average method and the CUSUM analysis [ 29 , 30 ]; and two studies applied the procedural-based assessment [ 31 , 32 ]. Moreover, six studies evaluated the learning process of resident surgeons [ 21 , 27 , 29 – 32 ], four of graduated surgeons [ 20 , 22 , 23 , 28 ], and three involved both residents and consultants [ 24 – 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Great heterogeneity in the learning curve assessment was noted; six studies described the chronological distribution in groups and their evaluation [ 21 26 ]; one study used the moving average method [ 27 ]; two studies used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis [ 20 , 28 ]; two studies adopted both the moving average method and the CUSUM analysis [ 29 , 30 ]; and two studies applied the procedural-based assessment [ 31 , 32 ]. Moreover, six studies evaluated the learning process of resident surgeons [ 21 , 27 , 29 – 32 ], four of graduated surgeons [ 20 , 22 , 23 , 28 ], and three involved both residents and consultants [ 24 – 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, Kim et al [ 30 ] published an analysis of 150 laparoscopic appendectomies performed by residents with a growing level of seniority and experience. Three residents, at the first, second or third year of training, performed 50 consecutive laparoscopic appendectomies; no significant differences were shown in operating time (OT) between the three operating residents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible reasons for this finding are as follows. (1) Trainees participate in surgery for education, which is reported to be associated with a longer operative time [16][17][18]. (2) Our institution is a cancer-specific hospital that performs fewer than 30 cases of LA annually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Safety is an important aspect to consider in surgery as common as appendectomy, where even the number of procedures performed by each surgeon has implications in increasing complications, length of hospital stay, and cost of the procedure. 27,29 In contrast, if performed safely and using a noninvasive method in a specialized environment, discharge rates can be achieved in less than a day in up to 90% of cases. 6,30 The technique described in this study, with three portals -one umbilical and two supra-pubic -has an extremely satisfactory aesthetic result, because the scars remain hidden behind the underwear when the abdominal wall is exposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%