2009 International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science 2009
DOI: 10.1109/itcs.2009.139
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the feature fusion method, the best performance was achieved by the Weightedsum rule at 94.52% accuracy. The Average rule recognition rate was at 96.41% and the Product rule recognition rate was at 96.20% [15]. The combination of 2DPCA and LDA achieved a higher recognition rate of 94.4% [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the feature fusion method, the best performance was achieved by the Weightedsum rule at 94.52% accuracy. The Average rule recognition rate was at 96.41% and the Product rule recognition rate was at 96.20% [15]. The combination of 2DPCA and LDA achieved a higher recognition rate of 94.4% [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel based non-intrusive fusion of ear and face features were obtained by utilizing connection relationship [15,19]. To achieve the rights management of digital content with large population coverage, watermarking algorithm was used.…”
Section: I) Fusion At Feature Extraction Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 sums up the various highlights of multi-modular biometric considers. Xu Xiaona et al [7] propose a novel bit based component combination calculation approach in the mix of face and ear. The component combination approach was acquainted and applied multimodal biometrics dependent on the ear and profile face biometrics combination, in blend with the KPCA or KFDA calculation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%