2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Note: Effect of egg storage length on spread of hatch window, chick quality, and organ development in Transylvanian naked neck chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chick weight and yield were not affected by egg storage length in the present trial. Abioja, Akinjute, et al (2020) had given a similar report on chick weight and yield in FUNAAB‐alpha chicken eggs. Other authors also reported no difference in chick weight from eggs stored between 1 and 7 days (Tona et al, 2004), 4 and 16 days (Goliomytis et al, 2015), 0 and 10 days (Senbeta, 2016), 1 and 14 days (Addo et al, 2018) and yield (Goliomytis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Chick weight and yield were not affected by egg storage length in the present trial. Abioja, Akinjute, et al (2020) had given a similar report on chick weight and yield in FUNAAB‐alpha chicken eggs. Other authors also reported no difference in chick weight from eggs stored between 1 and 7 days (Tona et al, 2004), 4 and 16 days (Goliomytis et al, 2015), 0 and 10 days (Senbeta, 2016), 1 and 14 days (Addo et al, 2018) and yield (Goliomytis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Eggs of TN chickens are noted to be sensitive to the extension of storage period. A recent report by Abioja et al (2022) stated that storage for 3, 6 and 9 days had already caused a reduction of 18.2%, 40.4% and 42.5% respectively in hatchability. Other reports had shown similar trend with consistent decline in hatchability without any peak as days of post‐ovipositional storage extend (Khan et al, 2013, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations