2017
DOI: 10.1515/amma-2017-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Article. Relationship Between High Levels of Salivary Cotinine Test and Demographic Characteristics of Pregnant Smokers from Mures County

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between the frequency of self-declared status regarding smoking in a group of pregnant women from Mures county, Romania and the high levels of Salivary Cotinine (SC) like biomarkers. Material and methods: It was conducted a retrospective study among 230 pregnant women presented for prenatal care at 50 General Practitioners cabinets in Mures county, Romania, in 2015. Data were collected with a validated questionnaire which included age, level of education, socioeconomic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 6 months postpartum, point-prevalence tobacco use was defined as self-reported use of any tobacco product in the past 7 days, and for those reporting abstinence, this was confirmed with a salivary cotinine concentration of ≤20 ng/mL or NicAlert test strip reading of 0 [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Results were classified as tobacco use if (1) the woman reported abstinence but cotinine was missing or elevated (except if using NRT; no participant reported e-cigarette use), or (2) if she reported using tobacco, irrespective of the cotinine result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 6 months postpartum, point-prevalence tobacco use was defined as self-reported use of any tobacco product in the past 7 days, and for those reporting abstinence, this was confirmed with a salivary cotinine concentration of ≤20 ng/mL or NicAlert test strip reading of 0 [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Results were classified as tobacco use if (1) the woman reported abstinence but cotinine was missing or elevated (except if using NRT; no participant reported e-cigarette use), or (2) if she reported using tobacco, irrespective of the cotinine result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%