2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-635x2007000300004
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The aim of this research study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of tinamous submitted to five different male:female ratios. The study was carried out with 72 birds in a randomized experimental design with 4 replications. Tinamous were housed in cages, using the ratios of one (1:1), two (2:1), three (3:1) and four (4:1) females per male, and also one male was housed with three females individually (3R:1), in a rotational system. Reproductive records of the breeding season from September 2004 to Marc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the present study, Cromberg et al (2007) found no significant differences (P>0.05) in the egg production of females between monogamous and polygynous mating. The results of the present study show that monogamous tinamous systems in captivity provided better egg production than systems in groups with a high density of animals per pen.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the present study, Cromberg et al (2007) found no significant differences (P>0.05) in the egg production of females between monogamous and polygynous mating. The results of the present study show that monogamous tinamous systems in captivity provided better egg production than systems in groups with a high density of animals per pen.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The fertility rates obtained for couples in the present study were superior to the performance of couples reported by Cromberg et al (2007), who obtained a percentage of 45.69%. The authors found no difference (P>0.05) compared to the group systems.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was expected because of the low bird density in each pen, which allowed bird movement and did not result in large excreta production, which would have caused litter moisture and caking, and therefore, higher probability of lesions. It must be noted, however, that applying higher bird rearing density could have compromised the experiment due to agonistic interactions among birds because red-winged tinamou is a non-domesticated species (Cromberg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%