2000
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v96.12.3953.h8003953_3953_3957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representational difference analysis using myeloid cells from C/EBPε deletional mice

Abstract: C/EBPε is a recently cloned member of the C/EBP family of transcriptional factors. Previous studies demonstrated that the expression of this gene is tightly regulated in a tissue specific manner; it is expressed exclusively in myeloid cells. C/EBPε-deficient mice developed normally but failed to generate functional neutrophils and eosinophils, and these mice died of opportunistic infections suggesting that C/EBPε may play a central role in myeloid differentiation. To identify myelomonocytic genes regulated by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphologically, the preparations for array hybridization were composed of ϳ30% monocytes, 60% neutrophils, and 7-10% lymphocytes in the C/EBPε ϩ/ϩ and C/EBPε Ϫ/Ϫ mice, as determined by differential counts of cytospins stained with Wright-Giemsa. This cellular composition was consistent with prior studies and would allow us to identify monocytic and granulocytic gene expression differences [10,19]. To minimize variation among individual mice, the samples were pooled according to the mouse genotype, and the chip set was hybridized.…”
Section: Identification Of Differentially Regulated Genesmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphologically, the preparations for array hybridization were composed of ϳ30% monocytes, 60% neutrophils, and 7-10% lymphocytes in the C/EBPε ϩ/ϩ and C/EBPε Ϫ/Ϫ mice, as determined by differential counts of cytospins stained with Wright-Giemsa. This cellular composition was consistent with prior studies and would allow us to identify monocytic and granulocytic gene expression differences [10,19]. To minimize variation among individual mice, the samples were pooled according to the mouse genotype, and the chip set was hybridized.…”
Section: Identification Of Differentially Regulated Genesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Representational difference analysis using peritoneal neutrophils and macrophages from wild-type and C/EBPε-deficient mice identified a small set of differentially regulated genes. These included several genes specific to myelomonocytic cells [19]. Consistent with aberrant macrophage gene expression, phenotypic changes were observed in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…C/EBPe also induces the gene expression of monocyte-colony-stimulating factor receptor (Williams et al, 1998), and is required for the development and function of mature macrophages (Tavor et al, 2002). The expression of chemokines MIP-1g and MCP-3 is defective in macrophages from C/EBPe-deficient mice (Kubota et al, 2000). This study indicates that HF-6 cells are presumably arrested at the monoblastic stage based on both morphological and immunophenotypical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Induction of the M‐CSF receptor with C/EBPε expression in these cells also suggests a role for C/EBPε in macrophage development and function [47]. Likewise, representational difference analysis of thioglycollate‐induced neutrophils and macrophages from C/EBPε‐deficient mice detects predominantly macrophage‐expressed genes including cathepsin L, MIP‐1γ, MCP‐3, and galactose/N‐acetylgalactosamine‐specific lectin [49]. C/EBPε induction of monocyte‐specific genes may represent a divergence between the role of C/EBPε in humans and rodents—monocytic differentiation of human bipotent cell lines such as HL60, U937, and NB4 results in reduced C/EBPε mRNA expression, and granulocytic differentiation produces increased expression [42, 43].…”
Section: Cebpεmentioning
confidence: 99%