2006
DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.19.2270
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Reported Outcomes in Major Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Funded by For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Organizations: 2000-2005

Abstract: Recent cardiovascular trials funded by for-profit organizations are more likely to report positive findings than trials funded by not-for-profit organizations, as are trials using surrogate rather than clinical end points. Trials jointly funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations appear to report positive findings at a rate approximately midway between rates observed in trials supported solely by one or the other of these entities.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
232
31
21
7

Citation Types

11
137
0
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
249
16
11
1

Relationship

1
276

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 277 publications

(164 citation statements)
references

References 53 publications

11
137
0
16
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our findings are in line with earlier studies demonstrating an association between for-profit-funded research and a more favorable outcome [1, 3, 5, 15]; however, these studies were based on data published 10–15 years ago. Previous research has been focused on specific medical fields, such as cardiovascular research [3], nutrition [16], or drug trials [5].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our findings are in line with earlier studies demonstrating an association between for-profit-funded research and a more favorable outcome [1, 3, 5, 15]; however, these studies were based on data published 10–15 years ago. Previous research has been focused on specific medical fields, such as cardiovascular research [3], nutrition [16], or drug trials [5].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012, 2-sided Fisher's exact test), indicating that industry-funded trials were significantly more likely to report statistically significant differences favoring target interventions compared with references. This result is consistent with the findings of previous reports [5-11], showing that industry-funded trials tended to produce results in favor of target interventions compared with references.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The result of this assignment is in line with the previous studies in the literature such as Davidson (1986), Yaphe et al (2001), Kjaergard and Als-Nielsen (2002), Bhandari et al (2004), Ridker and Torres (2006), Bero et al (2007) and Bourgeois et al (2010). They showed that there exists a positive relationship between pharmaceutical industries’ funding (profit organisations’ funding) of clinical trials and its success.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%