2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21916-0_75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of the ISMIS 2011 Contest: Music Information Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This aspect may have a very positive impact on the effectiveness of classification experiment. Still, as reported in the literature, for low level-feature-based approach and multi-class recognition, the effectiveness of music genre classification is in the range of 60-80% (Bergstra et al 2006;Tzanetakis et al 2002;Holzapfel and Stylianou 2008;Kostek et al 2011) with some exceptions (see e.g. Ntalampiras (2013)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This aspect may have a very positive impact on the effectiveness of classification experiment. Still, as reported in the literature, for low level-feature-based approach and multi-class recognition, the effectiveness of music genre classification is in the range of 60-80% (Bergstra et al 2006;Tzanetakis et al 2002;Holzapfel and Stylianou 2008;Kostek et al 2011) with some exceptions (see e.g. Ntalampiras (2013)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Feature vectors (FVs) for music genre classification are usually based on low-level descriptors from the MPEG-7 standard (Lindsay and Herre 2001;Hyoung-Gook et al 2005), Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) (Tzanetakis et al 2002) or finally, dedicated parameters suggested by researchers (Kostek 1999;Kostek et al 2011;Liu et al 2007;Nayak and Bhutani 2011;Salamon et al 2012;Silla et al 2007). Table 1 presents a list of parameters contained in the Synat database .…”
Section: Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are venues devoted to MIR only (e.g. ISMIR, MIREX) [18] [20][24] [34] in which state-of-the-art MIR methods and achievements are critically evaluated, also sessions, workshops, discussion panels dedicated to this domain occur within artificial intelligence, audio, multimedia and other symposia and conferences [14] [16][17] [23]. On the other hand, there exist many music recommendation services, commercial and non-commercial that are based on social networking rather than on MIR-related methods [31][38] [39[40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%