1996
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(1996)015<1439:rmd>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Measures Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of live insects per experimental unit was subjected to repeated-measures (multivariate) analysis of variance because determination of insect numbers per plant was carried out on the same plots at each evaluation date, 34,35 thereby avoiding the problem of pseudoreplication in time. 35 -37 This analysis was carried out using the PROC MANOVA procedure with the PROFILE statement, as suggested by von Ende. 38 When necessary, post hoc Tukey's HSD tests ( = 0.05) were performed to compare treatment means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of live insects per experimental unit was subjected to repeated-measures (multivariate) analysis of variance because determination of insect numbers per plant was carried out on the same plots at each evaluation date, 34,35 thereby avoiding the problem of pseudoreplication in time. 35 -37 This analysis was carried out using the PROC MANOVA procedure with the PROFILE statement, as suggested by von Ende. 38 When necessary, post hoc Tukey's HSD tests ( = 0.05) were performed to compare treatment means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experiment I, the same variable (egestion rate) was measured repeatedly over the test periods for each replicate using analysis of variance (ANOVA) [18,19]. The sphericity assumption of a test was checked with Mauchly's test.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BSAFs based on accumulation kinetics (k s /k e ) were tested by the Z-test applied procedure as described by Bailer et al [29]. The differences in egestion rates were measured using univariate repeated-measures analyses of variance [30] with SPSS 11.0. The sphericity assumption of the test was checked by Mauchly's test.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%