2013 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ausctw.2013.6510041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeat-accumulate codes for block-fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a comparison reference for our codes, root-LDPC block codes are considered [4]. This is the most known construction of block-codes for non-ergodic channels, which motivated a number of further results in this area [5], [6]. However, all the existing constructions are designed for a single specified value of d (in most of cases d = 2), and will not work well if the number of fading coefficients per codeword changes.…”
Section: Motivation: Codes Of Flexible Diversity Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a comparison reference for our codes, root-LDPC block codes are considered [4]. This is the most known construction of block-codes for non-ergodic channels, which motivated a number of further results in this area [5], [6]. However, all the existing constructions are designed for a single specified value of d (in most of cases d = 2), and will not work well if the number of fading coefficients per codeword changes.…”
Section: Motivation: Codes Of Flexible Diversity Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simplify the analysis, this paper assumes that Pe is computed over the whole codeword, and not over the information part of it, as it was previously assumed in[4]-[6]. So, the values of d, obtained in the present paper, are in fact lower bounds (one might still increase the diversity for information bits by placing them carefully within the codeword).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we compute the segment metric in (5). For the ease of representation, we use h, v, s and r to denote h(0), u [a(0),b(0)] , x [a(0),b(0)] and r [a(0),b(0)] , respectively.…”
Section: Sova-ncsi Decodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], a family of LDPC block codes, called root-LDPC codes, are proposed that provide full diversity 1 d = 2 over a block-fading channel with two fading gains per codeword. [4] motivated a number of further results on the design of full-diversity "root" codes, see [5], [6]. However, for a rate 1/2 code all these examples still have d = 2, and the boundedness of the root structure, on which they are built on, makes it a complicated task to extend these designs to d > 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%