Renal duplication anomalies in the fetus: clues for prenatal diagnosis

Abuhamad, Alfred; Horton, Charles E.; Horton, S.; Evans, Arthur T.

doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030174.x

Cited by 41 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is even possible to differentiate between ectopic ureter and ureterocele. 3,4 This may lead to the discovery of more cases of fetal renal duplications amenable to neonatal management. The present article deals with the estimation of the renal function of this pathological duplex kidney.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of Individual Renal Function in Children with Unilateral Complex Renal Duplication

Ismaïli

Hall

Ham

et al. 2005

The Journal of Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of Individual Renal Function in Children with Unilateral Complex Renal Duplication

Ismaïli

Hall

Ham

et al. 2005

The Journal of Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…3 Detection of 2 separate poles or ureterocele are the strongest predictors of duplex renal units with predictive power of 93% and 78%, respectively. 4 Antenatal ultrasound with a duplex kidney may only show cystic dysplasia, leading to unclear differentiation between masses of renal and suprarenal origin.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Atrophic upper pole of a duplex collecting system masquerading as suprarenal mass: a case study and literature review

Kavanagh

McAuley

Longpre

et al. 2013

CUAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing use of maternal fetal ultrasound is leading to the discovery of an increasing number of suprarenal masses. Our experience with a cystic suprarenal mass detected on antenatal ultrasound is described. Location and radiographic features could not rule out the possibility of a cystic neuroblastoma; therefore, surgical resection of the mass was performed. Despite the absence of common radiologic characteristics, the pathology of the specimen revealed a non-functioning upper pole of a duplex kidney with complete duplication of the collecting system. Neonatal evaluation and management and the differential diagnosis are discussed.Can Urol Assoc J 2010;4(4):E94-96 Case reportA routine second trimester ultrasound examination of a 28-year-old female (gravida 2, para 1) showed a well circumscribed, hypoechoic mass on the upper pole of the right fetal kidney. The mass measured about 6 cm in its largest diameter and appeared predominantly cystic in structure. The remainder of the detailed sonographic evaluation was unremarkable and no ureterectasis or ureterocele was observed. Size, echogenecity and structure of the mass remained unchanged throughout the pregnancy on repeated scans. An uneventful vaginal delivery at 38 weeks gestational age resulted in a female child with healthy Apgar scores.Postpartum examination of the neonate was completely normal, without palpable abdominal mass or lumbosacral abnormality. Abdominal ultrasound at 3 days demonstrated that the cystic structure remained unchanged in size and appeared contiguous with the upper pole of the kidney. The perinatal period was complicated with a simple, culture-positive urinary tract infection at 4 months, which was treated with oral cephalexin. The child was followed with serial ultrasounds at 3 month intervals during her first year of life (Fig. 1). Throughout this period, the cyst was noted to increase in size by a small amount (less than 1 cm in greatest diameter), but remained unchanged in echogenicity and structure. Renal size was comparable bilaterally throughout this period.At 11 months, the child was admitted to hospital with a second culture-positive urinary tract infection and treated with intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin. An ultrasound performed during her admission suggested that the cystic structure was more likely suprarenal in origin and displacing the right kidney. Subsequent imaging with a voiding cystogram was normal. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at this time further suggested suprarenal origin of the cyst with compression and anterior displacement of the upper pole of the right kidney (Fig. 2). Neither hydroureter nor ureterocele was observed on MRI.Based on the location and radiologic appearance of the cyst, our differential diagnosis included simple renal cyst, duplex kidney and adrenal neuroblastoma. . Due to the inability to eliminate neuroblastoma from the differential diagnosis, the patient was referred to our centre for surgical resection of the mass at 15 months. Via a flank approach, we explored the ...

show abstract

“…As a consequence, detailed examination of the hydronephrotic kidney initially reveals a duplex collecting system. [8][9][10] However, the definitive prenatal diagnosis relies on the confident identification of the dilated distal ureter protruding into the bladder, which produces a characteristic balloonlike appearance called the "bladder into the bladder" sign or the "Foley catheter" sign. 11…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%