2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution using moss (Drepanocladus revolvens) biomass: Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(66 reference statements)
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various conventional adsorbents such as carbon materials, carbons derived from agricultural wastes and industrial wastes, biomaterials, and other materials have been investigated for the mercury removal (Yardim et al 2003;Labidi 2008;Anirudhan et al 2008;Sari and Tuzen, 2009;Mehdinia et al 2015;Vasudevan et al 2012;Wang et al 2014) but they are not highly efficient. Therefore, researchers are still making great efforts to identify new adsorbents with high capacities and efficacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various conventional adsorbents such as carbon materials, carbons derived from agricultural wastes and industrial wastes, biomaterials, and other materials have been investigated for the mercury removal (Yardim et al 2003;Labidi 2008;Anirudhan et al 2008;Sari and Tuzen, 2009;Mehdinia et al 2015;Vasudevan et al 2012;Wang et al 2014) but they are not highly efficient. Therefore, researchers are still making great efforts to identify new adsorbents with high capacities and efficacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, biosorption has emerged as an effective alternative to the above-mentioned methods due to low operating cost, short operation time and absence of toxic by-product production (11). Among a number of biological materials available for biosorption, including moss (12), lichen (13) and fungus (14), algae have been recognized as a potent biosorbent material due to its easy and cheap availability, greater surface area and high metal binding capacity (15,16). Over the time period, brown and green algae have been exploited for heavy metal removal in comparison to red algae (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantages of biosorption are its high effectiveness in reducing the heavy metals and the use of inexpensive biosorbents [6]. Biosorption studies using various low cost biomass as adsorbents have been currently performed widely for the removal of heavy metals from aquatic effluent [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%