2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of hazardous volatile organic compounds from water by vacuum pervaporation with hydrophobic ceramic membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
76
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Kujawa et al prepared hydrophobic alumina and titania membranes by grafting C 6 F 13 C 2 H 4 Si(OEt) 3 (C6) molecules onto the membrane surface. A hydrophobic titania membrane treated with a C6 solution for 35 h showed separation factors of 30 and 91 for ethyl acetate (EA) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from water (organic content: 1% mass fraction), respectively [18]. Kujawa et al concluded that the higher selectivity for MTBE compared with EA was related to the smaller distance between the Hansen solubility parameters (HSPs) of C6 and MTBE than that between C6 and EA while both fluxes are similar (MTBE flux: 1.0 kg m À 2 h À 1 , EA flux: 1.1 kg m À 2 h À 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Kujawa et al prepared hydrophobic alumina and titania membranes by grafting C 6 F 13 C 2 H 4 Si(OEt) 3 (C6) molecules onto the membrane surface. A hydrophobic titania membrane treated with a C6 solution for 35 h showed separation factors of 30 and 91 for ethyl acetate (EA) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from water (organic content: 1% mass fraction), respectively [18]. Kujawa et al concluded that the higher selectivity for MTBE compared with EA was related to the smaller distance between the Hansen solubility parameters (HSPs) of C6 and MTBE than that between C6 and EA while both fluxes are similar (MTBE flux: 1.0 kg m À 2 h À 1 , EA flux: 1.1 kg m À 2 h À 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is of great importance to eliminate or recover VOCs from wastewaters. Many methods including air stripping, adsorption, distillation, advance oxidation, biological treatment, and membrane technology have been proposed to remove VOCs from water, and the pros and cons of these methods have been discussed previously . Pervaporation was regarded as an attractive separation technique for this application with obvious advantages of high efficiency, energy‐saving, and eco‐friendly…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that particular reason, the modification of membrane surface is required to change the surface character from hydrophilic to hydrophobic one. Considering the high effectiveness of the grafting process of ceramic materials and good performance in membrane-based separation techniques (e.g., vacuum pervaporation [42,43,54,55], vacuum membrane distillation [56], air-gap and direct membrane distillation [42,45], and organic solvent nanofiltration [47,48,57]) it should be pointed out that such modification also possessed disadvantages. Namely, a significant drawback is the presence of fluorine atoms in coupling agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%