Remittances and Energy Consumption: A Panel Data Analysis for MENA Countries

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effect of remittances on energy consumption. To this aim, we analyzed MENA countries over the 1977–2014 period. We used Westerlund and Edgerton's (2007) cointegration test, the AMG estimator, and Dumitrescu and Hurlin's (2012) panel causality tests. The results of the cointegration test showed there is a long-term relationship between remittance inflow and energy consumption. According to the AMG estimator, remittance inflow has a positive impact on energy consumption, indicating that increases in remittances will be followed by increases in energy consumption. The panel causality test displayed a bidirectional causal linkage between remittance and energy consumption. On the basis of these findings, we can say that authorities should take account of remittance inflow in their energy consumption and environmental degradation policies.

Do Urbanization, Remittances, and Globalization Matter for Energy Consumption in Belt and Road Countries: Evidence From Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption

“…Inflows of remittances in BRI countries revealed positive and statistically significant energy consumption, but in terms of elasticity, remittances augmented clean energy integration more prominently than non-renewable sources. Our study findings are supported by the existing literature works, such as Das et al (2021) for Bangladesh, Qin and Ozturk, (2021) for China, Rahman et al (2021) for the South Asian economy, Akçay and Demirtaş, (2015) for Morocco, and Ari (2022) for MENA economics. Study findings suggest that a household's capacity to expense with migrant remittances boosts purchasing power and simultaneously injects capital-intensive forces with additional energy demand for economic progress.…”